Answer:
An argument relies on a comparison of two things
Explanation:
Many arguments rely on an analogy between two or more objects, ideas, or situations. If the two things that are being compared aren’t really alike in the relevant respects, the analogy is a weak one, and the argument that relies on it commits the fallacy of weak analogy.
Analogy: a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
Loss of income
Let me know if it’s right or not please:)
The Kings used facts, examples, direct quotations and personal experiences, he also used Rhetorical questions, parallelism, loaded language
Explanation:
- The King chooses the word crippled in place of "held back" gives an example of using loaded language
- The King had been humble and precise in his language which is about the war in Vietnam and the struggle I and others have been facing in America.
- King also justifies that why he is speaking out against the Vietnam war. He also adds the following;
- Kings talks about Nobel Peace Prize winner.
- he also says that he is Christian minister.
- he also stand with the poor.
- in-short, the king's word with positive connotation has a great impact on its people.
Depends, are they only eating one pizza? Or can they eat more than a regular large pizza
If they got 3 regular large pizzas, that would be enough for the whole crew
But if it’s asking to split the regular large pizza among all of them, they would each get 1/3 of a slice
<span>Reich decision suggest about perseverance,
that according to him, people cannot do anything well without moral commitments
to excellence or anything for any length of time without the moral virtue of
perseverance. Hence that the doing of ethics also has moral commitments
appropriate to it. Through this, it required by general ethical imperatives
that promotes the maximum social welfare obtainable by preserving the peace and
preventing violence, enforces justice by promoting an even-handed compromise
that both sides find the state of peace with the other, especially with regard
to the concessions they had to make to obtain it really repugnant and it insists
on the dignity, worth and conscience of every individual, worthy of respect
even from those who are convinced that he or she is wrong. </span>
