<span>It was a privileged company formed in September 1599 by a group of English entrepreneur entrepreneurs with the purpose of engaging in trade with the East Indies, thus ending the monopoly exercised by Dutch companies on the lucrative trade in spices. As a result, for the Indians, it became the maximum exponent of the English colonial system in India, giving benefits and good results for the indigenous community of the region.</span>
<span>Napoleon, similar to any great undemocratic and dictatorial leader wanted control over his followers s In the wake of seeing that the creatures (a few) needed the windmill, napoleon chose to offer in to their desires, to show up as the ruler who thought of the thought initially and needed the homestead to be innovatively exceptional something, he asserts, snowball did not need.
Another method for taking a gander at it is that he understood that it spoke to a few decent things for him. It was a simple method to influence other creatures to do what he needed, and gave them a remark on to keep their consideration off what he was doing, and also destroying them so that regardless of whether they desired and are going to oust him, they were excessively drained.</span>
Answer:
They are the opposite of each other
Explanation:
Harry: teaches at school; loves to paint when he has time; <u>voted for the candidate whose economic policies he strongly believed in, such as providing incentives for people to start their own businesses.</u>
Julie: works at a government-owned factory; Julie is a born artist; the government <u>restricts</u> the number of businesses that can be started each year.
HOPE THIS HELPS :)
Similarities:
Both empires emerged in the 14th and 15th centuries as postclassic civilizations building on the innovations of earlier political powers but expanding to greater extents
Both empires were entirely infantry, but well supplied, well-organized, and extremely aggressive and militaristic. Javelins, slings, spears and maces were used in battle.
Both empires had inherent instabilities
Both empires were fueled by corn.
Both empires have little to no seafaring, and instead stuck to the mountains and valleys in the center of the region.
Both empires conquered hundreds of cities in the region that resented their rule and taxation
Both empires were ended by Spanish invasions that capitalized on native divisions, introduced disease, and Spanish technology of guns, horses, and steel.
Both empires are misnamed-the Inka was the ruler of Tawantinsuyu, and the Aztecs adopted the name Mexica.
Both empires provided public education
Both Atahualpa and Moctezuma decided against confronting the Spanish militarily, allowing for the Spanish to take the Emperors hostage.
Attempts to restore the monarchy came after the capture and death of the emperor, but were too late.
Differences:
The Incas were bronze age, Aztecs were stone age
THe Incas assigned governors and shuffled conquered peoples around. There was a greater centralization than in Mexico
The Aztecs were a tributary empire, not a direct one.
The Aztecs had writing, while the Incas used Quipu
The Aztecs still had many rivals left unsubdued
The Inca used mostly potatoes while corn was far more dominant in Mexico.
The Inca had llamas, small but important livestock that made transport easier
The Inca had a sophisticated courier system of Chasquis along state-maintained roads
The Inca used bronze axes and halberds, with slings and maces as their main weapons alongside spears. The Aztecs used obsidian swords and glaives instead for close combat, and used javelins far more. Likewise, while Inca military relied on the unit’s experience and officer corps for their quality like the Romans, the Aztecs instead had a feudalistic division between the elite knights and commoners, with advancement by taking captives.
The Inca allowed women into their schools but not commoners. The Aztecs prohibited women but allowed for peasant men to also gain an education.
The diseases that destroyed the Incas came before the Spanish actually arrived in Peru, while the Spanish had been in Mexico for months before the plagues killed the emperor and populace.
Moctezuma’s mistake was trying to use generosity to awe the Spanish and try to coax them on his side, while Atahualpa’s was trying to awe them with his army rather than actually using it.
The Inca political crisis was a civil war between two brothers, while the Aztec’s was a three way duel between the King, the Priests, and the Aristocracy and military.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Ending Segregation and racial injustice in America
