Answer:
Pakistan's military dictator Ayub Khan decided to shift the capital city from Karachi to Islamabad in late 1950 as Karachi had become economic hub of the country and the infrastructure of the city was proving inadequate for the growing needs of the city.
Explanation:
In the long history of European colonialism, some colonialists did better by their colonies than others, and the legacy is mostly one of still-enduring pain. For example, virtually no one save Newt Gingrich<span> thinks the Belgians did much of a job in Central Africa, where their mistakes included artificially dividing the population into Hutus and Tutsis, precipitating one of the continent's worst humanitarian disasters. But many historians generally consider the British presence in India, while </span>at times<span> horrifically </span>violent, to be one of the most benevolent and productive in colonial history. Was it a net gain for India? Or did it cause more harm than good? <span>India's democracy is truly extraordinary. ... India's political system owes much to the institutions put in place by the British over two hundred years ago. In many other parts of Asia and in Africa, the British were a relatively temporary presence. They were in India for centuries. They saw it as the jewel in their imperial crown and built lasting institutions of government throughout the country--courts, universities, administrative agencies. But perhaps even more importantly, India got very lucky with the vehicle of its independence, the Congress Party, and its first generations of post-independence leaders, who nurtured the best traditions of the British and drew on older Indian customs to reinforce them.
hope this helps
</span>
The statements that agrees with the text concerning the use of the atomic bomb as we have in the excerpt are:
- The scientists felt that saving American lives had to take priority in the war.
- Most of the scientists believed using the bomb to force a surrender was the only option.
<h3>Why was there a debate on the use of the atomic bomb?</h3>
This was due to the fact that the scientists understood the impact that the bomb could have on the environment and the lives around.
The bomb was used against the Japanese in Hiroshima during the second world war. It was a way of getting the Japanese to surrender.
Read more on the atomic bomb here: brainly.com/question/12757291
#SPJ1
Hey there,
Answer:
Japan wanted to expand its borders and looked for nation to colonize. In 189, Japan convinced Korea to open its ports to trade with Japan. However, China controlled much of Korea's trade. This conflict led to the Sino - Japanese war. Japan emerged victorious in this war. It captured part of Manchuria, which had been under Chinese occupation.
Hope this helps :D
<em>~Top</em>