Answer:
Justification of effort
Explanation:
When a person attaches more value to an outcome of an effort, greater than the objective value of the outcome, this situation is known as effort justification.
Here, the objective value of Carl's outcome was very less. He reminisce's about his first job thinking that it was worthwhile when in fact objectively his effort had very little value.
This happens because of the discrepancy in the amount of effort put in and the reward which leads to a cognitive dissonance. By adjusting one's attitude this dissonance is resolved.
The answer to your question is that the court would use the Exclusionary Rule.
Hope this helped...sorry if it was wrong.
Answer:
I believe that it should continue to welcome Syrian refugees and provide asylum to them in this time of crisis. Canada should also continue to support them financially until they are self-sufficient. Canada can speed up the process of resettling them by having a better plan about housing when they arrive and hiring more personnel.
It should contribute by volunteering with the United Nations to provide resources, like food and medical aid, to the refugees who are not resettled.
Canada should also help by sending diplomats and peacekeepers to help solve the root of the problem.
Answer:
it is d the most coomon senese one u need to look confindeint.
Explanation:
