Answer:
No I do not agree with Andre says that 3 divided by 2/3 Solving for 3 ÷ 2/3
3 ÷ 2/3
= 3 × 3/2
= 9/2
= 4 1/2
Therefore, 3 divided by 2/3 is 4 1/2
Andre's reasoning is wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is incorrect
Let's divide and compare the sum
3 : 2/3 = 3*3/2 = 9/2 = 4 1/2
and
There are four 2/3 fractions and one 1/3 fraction
The 1/3 fraction is 1/2 of 2/3 fraction so instead of counting 1/3 as 1/3 it should be counted as 1/2
The answer is A, (5 + 2x) * 8
The commutative property means that the order of addition or multiplication does not matter
Answer:
fail to reject the null hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the information provided I would fail to reject the null hypothesis. This is because the Miles per gallon that the independent testing firm has concluded for the car nearly matches the car's MPG claim. The difference being 0.1 . Since the standard deviation is 1.1 for this test, this means that the average falls perfectly within this range and makes the data very compelling. Combine this with a very low level of significance, I would say that the claim is backed by the data.
Answer:
<h2>72</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
