Answer:
$4,522
Explanation:
As the restaurant is not acquired so the amount of $28,000 would be non-deductible
Also if the expenses is incurred so the maximum deduction allowed is in excess of $50,000 is $5,000
Now
= $51,000 - $50,000
= $1,000 reduction
And,
= $5,000 - $1,000
= $4,000 deduction
Now
= $51,000 - $4,000
= $47,000
Now
= $47,000 ÷ 180 months
= $261 × 2 months
= 522
Now total deduction is
= $4,000 + $522
= $4,522
Answer:
Following are the responses to the given question:
Explanation:
The distribution channel contains several interdependent organizations responsible for the production of a material to be used or use. Different types of goods were available - either qualitative and quantitative. Although two may lead to satisfied customers, the advertising and marketing of goods differ greatly.
There are tangible items that we can see, sound, and feel. For example, in my hand, I could hold a DVD. Immaterial materials are not visible. You can hold insurance papers in the hands, for example, but it doesn't purchase. People can buy family life insurance, and they can see, touch and smell.
The tangible product distribution includes stock or retailer. It includes primarily producers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, or customers.
Generosity or travel products are distributed through companies, marketing officials, distributors, and consumers.
Answer: Option B
Explanation: Opportunity cost refers to the of loss of profit when an individual or firm chooses one alternative over other.
The statement in the given case, depicts the opportunity cost one has to pay of using the scarce resources that could be sued on different alternatives.
The lunch is never free depicts that one could have used it in other alternatives that may have produced some economic benefits.
Hence, the correct option is B.
Answer:
The handwritten clause generally supersedes the preprinted clause.
Explanation:
Answer:
Net income decreased by $4,850,000.
Explanation:
Given total overhead applied = $48000000
The actual overhead = $52850000
Over/under Applied overhead = total overhead applied - Actual overhead at the end of the year.
Over / under Applied overhead = 48000000-52850000
Over / under Applied overhead = -$4850000
From the calculation, it can be seen that the overhead is underapplied therefore when under applied overhead allocated to cost of goods sold then cost of goods sold decreased by $4850000.
