Answer: This is not plagiarism
Which of the following is true for the Student Version?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the use of a published work without attributing credit to the author. Word-for-word plagiarism is when a body of text is copied from the original work and made to seem like one's work.
Paraphrasing Plagiarism rewrites the text by substituting words with their synonyms but it still has the same information as the original text.
In this question, the student's version is different from the original text. The student argues for the efficiency of rapid prototyping while the original text explains why it is a possible design methodology for instructional design. What they both have in common is that they mention how successful rapid prototyping has been in software design.
Inference means when one uses observation as well as background in order to have a logical conclusion. It is use in one's everyday life. In the scenario mentioned, the best answer would be Dylan then spend much time in games thus school works suffer.
Answer:
The cases were about racial segregation.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education(1954) was a Supreme Court case which ruled that children's racial segregation in government's schools was illegal. The decision by the Supreme court showed that everyone is equal despite their colour or religion.
Milliken v. Bradley(1974) was a Supreme Court case in the United States regarding the outlined desegregation of busing among public school students in Detroit. There was a plan to blend students of different races in United States public schools following the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). The decision was the opposite of the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education as segregation was encouraged.
The court refused to remedy unequal and separate education. Children need to learn together and understand each other. I believe voters who disagreed with the ruling could have made a peaceful protest regarding the decision made. Also, since the public schools were mainly funded by taxes, the people who opposed the decision could have refused to pay tax in order to voice their opinions on the issues.
Anna<span> O. was the pseudonym of a patient of Josef Breuer, who published her </span>case<span>study in his book Studies on Hysteria,</span>
