1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRINA_888 [86]
2 years ago
8

How is organizing history by period different from organizing history by

History
1 answer:
joja [24]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. A historian who organizes the past by region focuses on a specific start and end date, whereas a historian who organizes the past by period focuses on the most influential individuals.

Explanation:

To the extent that history is continuous and inapplicable, all systems of periodization are additional or less impulsive. However without named periods, but clumsy or inaccurate, the diversion would be nothing but dispersed events without a structure to assist people to perceive them

You might be interested in
Who was Francisco Franco?
iren2701 [21]
Spanish general who ruled over spain from 1939 to 1975... during his ruling he assumed the title Caudillo
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do scholars believe that Basho revised his journal after traveling to the north?
avanturin [10]
Most scholars<span> agreeing that only the first seven chapters of the 33, the ... Even </span>Basho's travel journals<span>, especially "Oku No Hoso Michi," are tightly controlled .... Only </span>after<span> he wakes </span>does<span> he know it ... Chuang Tzu are intended to express </span>his<span> own poetic purposes and </span>do<span> not parrot ... </span>Basho believed<span> that the notion of rensouce </span>
7 0
3 years ago
HELP
Hoochie [10]
Germany defended its aggression, claiming Lusitania had carried weapons and war supplies and was therefore fair game. As they continued to divert blame, British propaganda against them snowballed.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Supreme Court’s decision on California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians significant?
PSYCHO15rus [73]

The correct answer is A

California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians was a US Supreme Court landmark decision issued in 1987. It abolished laws which restricted gaming and gambling on Indian reservations. States desired to control gaming in reservations but this decision concluded that Indian gambling could only be restricted in states where all gaming activities were deemed criminal according to state law. It was considered unconstitutional, that the states tried to limit only certain type of gambling activities and not others.

6 0
3 years ago
What is wrong with the queens quote
marin [14]
I just needs some points
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Calculus was developed by<br><br> A-Vesalius<br> B-Newton <br> C-Locke<br> D-Galileo
    13·1 answer
  • Who created an Islamic Empire in Delhi, India?
    10·1 answer
  • how would you define the term "massacre"? How many people have to die in order for an event to be called a "massacre".
    6·1 answer
  • Though Lewis and Clark hired a Frenchman to help them translate Indian languages, who ended up being the real help on the expedi
    5·1 answer
  • The British government decided to tax the American colonies
    10·1 answer
  • Who was Nicolas Copernicus?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was President Johnson elated after the Senate's vote on the eleventh article of
    11·1 answer
  • Stalin was ruthless in his mission to introduce communism in Russia through his 5 year plans from 1928-1938 do you agree with th
    13·1 answer
  • 'Powell argues against immigration because
    5·1 answer
  • Which statements are examples of contemporary conservative beliefs?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!