Answer:
$69.87
Explanation:
The price i would be willing to pay for the stock can be determined by finding the present value of the dividend payments
Present value is the sum of discounted cash flows
Present value can be calculated using a financial calculator
Cash flow in year 1 = 3.1
Cash flow in year 2 = 3.38
Cash flow in year 3 = 3.70
Cash flow in year 4 = 4.02
Cash flow in year 5 = 4.38 + 95 = 99.38
I = 11%
Present value = $69.87
To find the PV using a financial calculator:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
Answer:
The difference in the direct materials cost per equivalent unit between the two months is $0.70.
Explanation:
First calculate the direct cost per equivalent unit in September
Direct cost per equivalent unit = Total Cost / Total Equivalent units
= $12,000 / 7,500
= $1.60
<u>Difference between the two months.</u>
September = $1.60
Less August = ($0.90)
Difference = $0.70
In early America, a traditional market structure existed when people bartered goods they produced for goods they needed.
Explanation:
Bartering is the mechanism between two entities without the use of cash in the exchange of trading products or services. When people trade, they are all benefited by receiving goods or services that they need or want.
Bartering does have a benefit as there is something that even people with no money could get for them. Bartering may include exchanging an object for a service.
For eg, in return for a tin of apples from either a tree in their yards you might agree to work for somebody. If you choose to trade for a need, you can save cash for other requirements.
Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
a) Usually a contract has the following elements:
Offer
.
Acceptance
.
Consideration
.
Intention to create a legal relationship
.
In the given case, the intention to create a legal relationship is missing. Though Study had sent a written legal contract to Burrow to affirm the contract, Burrow did not show any interest regarding the same. Hence Burrow can’t be sued for breach of contracts. Moreover the confirmation letter sent by Study does not qualify under the Merchant Memo Rule as the involved parties are not merchants. Burrow can use the terms of UCC for his favour. The UCC states that any contract with value more than $500 must be in writing. As the involved amount in this case is $1300, hence this case does not qualify as a contract under UCC.
b) If Study and Burrow were merchants, then the Merchant Memo Rule gets applicable. Then in that case, if 2 merchants enter into an oral contract, which is worth $500 or more and one of the merchant sends a written confirmation for the same, then a contract will be considered enforceable. In such a case, Burrow will be held liable for breach of contract and can be sued by Study.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Proper planning without control is futile, this is because a blue print may have been put in place in the planning process but it becomes imperative for management to set up institutions or machineries to ensure that plans are executed as expected and there are remedial actions or plans in place in the event when unexpected events come up to distort achievement of the goal.
Proper control leads to achievement of organizational goals.
