This passage refers to the events of the Battle of Marathon due to while Persionas and Athenians where fighting in this town close to Athens, Phiedippides was sent to send a message to try to make Spartans join at the battle. The other three battles had the participation of the Spartans being a runner as Phiedippides not needed.
Answer:The public forum doctrine
Explanation:The public forum doctrine is a tool used in First Amendment jurisprudence which is used as a constitution that define speech restrictions but it also gives permission to a group to have a rally in a particular property or engage in whatever activity in a particular property.
Traditional Public Forums
- These forums includes public parks , sidewalks and areas that are open for political speech and debate , these are the areas in which people get protected under the First Amendment protection. The government under the public forum doctrine is accepted not to discriminate against any speakers irrespective of their views but should provide protection with only stipulated restricted in their speech.
Answer:
Every society, regardless of its political structure, must develop an economic system to determine how to use its limited productive resources to answer the three basic economic questions of what, how, and for whom to produce
Explanation:
Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
<span>poverty leads to lack of purchasing
power, leading to poor nutrition, affecting the potential to work and
generate income, leading to further poverty.
malnutrition makes children
susceptible to infections, which further decreases their nutritional
intake, leading to further malnutrition</span>
