School Children are most likely to not participate in non-violent activism.
1. Due to the laws of inertia if an object is stopped abruptly the
force of the moving object translates to whatever object it is in
contact with which will cause the person not wearing the seatbelt to be
propelled forward with the force of the car.
2. The stopping distance
changes if constant resistance is applied against two different forces
of varying magnitude such that the larger the force the greater the
stopping distance.
3. For the same Kinetic Energy the stopping
distance of a small vehicle will be less than the larger vehicle due to
the conversion of inertia.
4. The best way to prepare for sharp curves is to slow down the car before taking the curve.
5.
Due to the laws of inertia and conservation of momentum the faster the
car is moving the greater inertia that it will exert and the greater
momentum it will generate forward which if the car comes to a stop is
translated to the passengers inside which propels them forward with an
equivalent force which will be more pronounced as the object being
propelled by the same acceleration is now much smaller.
The main goal of the temperance reformers was to prohibit the consumption of alcohol.
I hoped this helped! Please rate, thank, and pick the Brainliest answer (not necessarily mine!). Thanks, it really helps! :)
It was the academic community who <span>mostly agreed and backed the book's scientific research and evidence. Also the public opinion backed Carson's text. On the other hand, t</span>here was strong backlash <span>from the chemical industry for book's message. </span>DuPont, Velsicol Chemical Company<span>, and the </span>American Cyanamid<span> biochemist </span>Robert White-Stevens<span> and former Cyanamid chemist </span>Thomas Jukes<span> were amongst the aggressive critics of the research especially that it was attacking the chemicals that they were producing.</span>
There are huge loss of life and property in a total cost.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The concept of " cost war" means that there are no limits in that war. Anyone can be attacked in that war and there is no restriction on the type of weapon also that is to be used in that war.
So the benefits of such a war can not be any but there can be only cost of the war because it can only lead to the harm of the life and property of the people who are involved in that total war. Benefits never out weigh the costs.
