Answer:
Taking more samples from different parts of an acre.
Explanation:
Validity and accuracy of the data is crucial for any serious research. In this particular case, the most accurate data would be obtained if earthworms would be counted on the whole acre. Of course, this would consume lot of time, people, money etc. That's why methods for estimation are used. Estimation best works with large number of samples. Since one acre equals over 4000 square meters, taking only five samples from such a big area is simply not enough for obtaining valid data.
One of the possible ways to improve estimation is to take more samples per acre while avoiding taking adjacent samples because it could be possible that number of earthworms in one part of an acre is increased (or decreased) for any reason, which would lead us to wrong conclusion.
For the answer to the question above, I think that <span>lowest risk of suffering serious consequences from a foodborne illness is <u>"</u><u>that the person who is recovering </u><u>from</u><u> a surgery</u></span><u>".
</u>I hope my answer helped you. Have a nice day! <u>
</u>
I'll give some help
if u know Country's it will be easier and if u know how the Country looks like it will make sense. Basically just read the bottom paragraph and it will make sense.
The effects could be, the top consumers may run out of food, which would make it harder for them to catch food
