All categories

3 years ago

‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️Please please help quickly!

Mathematics

2 answers:

Aloiza [94]3 years ago

4 0

It's actually c hoped this helped

Colt1911 [192]3 years ago

4 0

The equation for set B can be written as
y = x + 2
That is a linear association with a slope of +1 (positive).

The correct choice is ...
Set B

You might be interested in

Will you please help me with this question?

insens350 [35]

Answer:

i can't see it make it more noticeable

4 0

3 years ago

I’ll give brainliest help

Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

This will be letter j). 1,767.1 in 3

Step-by-step explanation:this is the closest estimate to the cubic inch plz brainliest

8 0

3 years ago

Please tell me the steps to this problem. i will give brainliest

gayaneshka [121]

Option C: -3 is the average rate of change between $x=-1$ and $x=1$

Explanation:

The formula to determine the average rate of change is given by

Average rate of change = $\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$

We need to find the average rate of change between $x=-1$ and $x=1$

Thus, from the table, we have,

$x_1=-1$ , $y_1=5$

$x_2=1$ , $y_2=-1$

Thus, substituting these values in the formula, we get,

Average rate of change = $\frac{-1-5}{1+1}$

$=\frac{-6}{2}$

$=-3$

Thus, the average rate of change between $x=-1$ and $x=1$ is -3.

Hence, Option C is the correct answer.

6 0

3 years ago

Can somebody help me find the surface area of this

-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

G. 7600 $cm^{2}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Deconstruct the shape

2 rectangles with dimension of 50 cm x 20 cm

2 rectangles with dimension of 40 cm x 20 cm

2 rectangles with dimension of 40 cm x 50 cm

Step 2: Find surface area of the shapes

2(50 x 20) = 2000 $cm^{2}$

2(40 x 20) = 1600 $cm^{2}$

2(40 x 50) = 4000 $cm^{2}$

Step 3: Add the surface areas together

2000 + 1600 + 4000 = 7600 $cm^{2}$

Therefore the surface area is 7600 $cm^{2}$ and the answer is G.

4 0

4 years ago

NO LINKS PLEASE I ACTUALLY NEED HELP THEY'RE 2 PARTS

eimsori [14]

I’m on the same question

3 0

3 years ago