Yes, because morally, it’s the right thing to do. Our common humanity means that those of us who are doing well (often doing <em>too</em> well) should help those whose basic needs are not met. And, in part, our personal and national wealth has often been created by the exploitation of poor people – colonial extraction of resources, the slavery and opium trades, unfair international trade and finance practices and others. Reallocating just <em>1% of global wealth</em> would eradicate extreme income poverty at a stroke. Those of us who are ‘better-off’ would be stupid not to help the poor. If we want a prosperous, politically stable and environmentally sustainable world for ourselves (and for future generations), then we have to help poor people in poorer, less fortunate lands.
Hope this helps, honey. Best of luck with assignments like these.
I don’t know for sure but I think 4
Answer:
perforated country I think
Answer:
a.No contract was formed because the offer was not communicated to the offeree by the means chosen by the offeror.
Explanation:
Hello! It was an oversight on the part of the secretary to comment on the proposal informally, as it ended up contaminating the entire plan that the boss had in her new offer for Deanna, causing discontent because the contract was serious and it's converted in an unprofessional situation.
Thanks for your question!
North Africa is subject to foreign invasions because its location on the Mediterranean Sea provides ports and access to other waterways.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The geographical orientation of the continent of Africa has allowed it to form the Mediterranean Sea with the major European peninsulas on the other end of the sea.
This attribute of a neighbourhood with the important European countries and access to the Atlantic Ocean through the Strait of Gibraltar made North Africa an attractive region in the contemporary world geopolitics.
