<span><span><span>Public debate - radioactive wastes management</span>International Nuclear Information System (INIS)</span>Between September 2005 and January 2006 a national debate<span> has been organized on the radioactive wastes management. This </span>debate<span> aimed to inform the </span>public<span> and to allow him to give his opinion. This document presents, the reasons of this </span>debate<span>, the operating, the synthesis of the results and technical documents to bring information in the domain of radioactive wastes management.</span>
</span>
There is no alliteration present in this
Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.
Answer:
Explanation:
For verbs with the format Consonant-Vowel-Consonant, double the last letter of the word then add -ed.
*Keep in mind that this rule has exceptions though.
Answer:
In the above mentioned scenario, Sonia uses the rhetorical appeal of Logos.
Explanation:
There are basically three types of rhetorical appeals: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. In the above mentioned example, Sonia hava made use of Logos appeal to persuade the undergraduate students.
Logos is an appeal where the person try to convince its audience by the use of logic or reason. Sonia uses logos by presenting her theorems which means a true and factual statement accepted and proved by mathematical operations to the students.
