Answer:
8.14
Explanation:
The Rate of Return is 8.14 from my calculations which you can find in the attached file.
Now since the Rate of return is 8.14. Which is less than MARR of 12%, it shows that investment is not good.
The United States government was correct in interfering with the growth of Standard Oil. Not only was the company taking advantage of existing situations, but eventually it would have controlled the oil market entirely. If Standard Oil was able to gain control of the market for a long period of time, consumers could have had to pay extremely high prices for the oil that they needed, limiting their purchase of other goods. Or Sample response: The United States government should not have interfered with the growth of Standard Oil. Because the company had managed to reduce production costs, it was able to offer very low prices to consumers. This benefited many Americans. Without the company's production benefits, citizens were not able to take advantage of this infrastructure.
Answer:
Natural experiment
Explanation:
Natural experiment is the study of empirical, which comprise of the individuals who are exposed to the control as well as the conditions of the experimental , which are determined or evaluated by the nature or through other kinds of factors that are outside the person control.
The procedure of governing the exposures resemble the random experiment. This experiment are not controllable and are the observational studies. So, the event is naturally occurring, then it is an example of the natural experiment.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
when pay becomes high with respect to several executives or just one, the resources and expense needed to keep the business growing....will be shortened
Answer:
1: C. In most states, Alex would be found not guilty by reason of insanity.
2: C. fining the corporation.
3: D. shoot a man who is about to spray you with a water hose.
4: C. not guilty because he did not act on his plan.
5: C. a misdemeanor.
6: B. free because she acted under duress.
7: D. would have a conclusive presumption in his favor of not having been responsible.
8: D. have not engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity because they made only six sales.
9: A. the defendant's statements cannot be admitted as evidence.
10: C. arraigned
