Answer:
Cicero
Explanation:
The Second Triumvirate was the political alliance that was formed between Augustus Caesar, Marcus Antonius, and Marcus Aemilius after the assassination of Julius Caesar so they could avenge his death and take control of the Roman Republic back.
Those three used Proscriptions to persecute the political opponents of the Caesarian faction, the most notable one was Cicero that was a strong opposition to Julius Caesar, he was considered an enemy of the State, he was captured and killed.
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option 1. The Code of Hammurabi was a major contribution to the development of civilization because it <span>treated citizens and slaves equally. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
If by "difference" you mean the difference with other Enlightenment thinkers who argued on behalf of the social contract, the main difference was Rousseau's emphasis on the GENERAL WILL of the people.
Along with other Enlightenment thinkers, Rousseau agreed with the idea of the social contract. (Indeed, that's the title of one of his most famous books.) The idea of a "social contract" is that the people agree to give authority to a government in order to make their lives in society better.
In his social contract theory, Rousseau insisted that that the PEOPLE of a nation are SOVEREIGN -- meaning that the people are always the ones who are to be deciding matters for their own society. Rousseau famously asserted that the "GENERAL WILL" of the people is always right, because the people on the whole have the best sense of what is needed for them as a society.
Some have criticized Rousseau's approach as promoting an unworkable view of government run completely by democratic referendum. But if you read his famous book, <em>The Social Contract, </em>you'll see his view of the "general will" is more nuanced than that. It isn't just a majority ballot sort of thing. For instance, in the 2016 presidential election in America, the "general will" that was most expressing itself was that the country wasn't greatly happy about either candidate running for the office of chief executive of the country. If Rousseau's "general will" principle had been put into action, the nation might have called for a new round of nominations to produce a candidate that could have pulled the nation together rather than divisive candidates and parties pulling the country in opposite directions.
If people are going to break the law— no law is going to stop them. So why have any laws at all
