Answer:
A solution to locate and punish cyber intruders is to promote software capable of identifying the IP of intruder computers, that is, those that do not have an IP authorized by the software. This software must also be able to store unauthorized and therefore intrusive IPs.
Explanation:
DISEC is the acronym that refers to the Disarmament and International Security Committee, which is a UN department that deals with global disarmament issues, with the aim of promoting security and combating threats to world peace. It is extremely important that the files and work of the DISEC community, be restricted to people who work directly with this, for this reason, it is necessary that strategies are created that prevent cybernetic invaders from having access to any information in this sector. In this case, it would be beneficial to create software capable of identifying and storing the IP of attacking computers, allowing these attackers to be found and punished.
A computer's IP is an identifier of the computer, the network used for access and the location where access was made. By having the IP of invading computers, the UN would have access to the location of the users of these computers, being able to find and punish them.
Answer:
Survivor and witness testimonies—firsthand accounts from individuals who lived through or encountered genocide and other atrocities—help students more deeply appreciate and empathize with the human and inhuman dimensions of important moments in history.
Explanation:
go here Search Results
Lesson: Using Testimony to Teach | Facing History
Hello:) the vehicle will roll DOWN the hill. No matter if your facing down or up the hill, the car will roll! Be careful your brakes don’t fail on a hill;) good luck!! Hopefully this helped!
This is based on who is telling the truth. The defendant denys being in the city at the time of the murder, but then a local newspaper states that he heard gunshots from inside his apartment the day of the murder (which would be impossible if he wasn't in the city at the same of the murder). There could also be a chance that the newspaper could be lying mainly because the defendant objected that the evidence was correct. In this case, the judge should take this into consideration especially when a local newpaper article announced that the defendant heard gunshots after saying that he was never in the city. So I would say, the newspaper article could be evidence to prove that the defendant is responsible for the murder.
