1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pepsi [2]
3 years ago
7

A lawyer contacted by telephone a nationally-recognized malpractice defense attorney after being sued by a client for negligentl

y handling a case. The defense attorney, who had never worked for the lawyer before, agreed and immediately began handling the matter. The two met in person the next week to discuss details about the representation. During the conversation, the defense attorney stated the customary hourly fee and expense reimbursement policy. The lawyer felt the fee was high, but agreed to pay it. The defense attorney intended to follow up with a letter to document the conversation, but forgot to do so. The defense attorney continued to work on the matter for several months, and after it was successfully resolved, submitted a bill to the lawyer. The bill accurately reflecting the hourly fees and expenses, which were reasonable.
Did the defense attorney violate Rule 1.5?
A. Yes, because the hourly rate was not disclosed prior to commencement of the representation.
B. Yes, because the defense attorney did not document the conversation about fees and expenses in writing.
C. No, because the defense attorney successfully handled the representation.
D. No, because the defense disclosed the basis of her fee within a reasonable time after commencing the representation.
Law
1 answer:
ryzh [129]3 years ago
5 0
I may be wrong but I’m pretty sure it’s c
You might be interested in
13. On a two-week vacation in a neighboring state,
irga5000 [103]
It’s A because of the law
7 0
3 years ago
Explain the steps in the arrest and prosecution of someone who is accused of a felony. Your response should be at least 150 word
choli [55]

Answer:

take what you need

Explanation:

Arrest

Criminal prosecution typically begins with an arrest by a police officer. A police officer may arrest a person if (1) the officer observes the person committing a crime; (2) the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by that person; or (3) the officer makes the arrest under the authority of a valid arrest warrant. After the arrest, the police books the suspect. When the police complete the booking process, they place the suspect in custody. If the suspect commited a minor offense, the policy may issue a citation to the suspect with instructions to appear in court at a later date.

Bail

If a suspect in police custody is granted bail, the suspect may pay the bail amount in exchange for a release. Release on bail is contingent on the suspect's promise to appear at all scheduled court proceedings. Bail may be granted to a suspect immediately after booking or at a later bail review hearing. Alternatively, a suspect may be released on his "own recognizance." A suspect released on his own recognizance need not post bail, but must promise in writing to appear at all scheduled court appearances. Own recognizance release is granted after the court considers the seriousness of the offense, and the suspect's criminal record, threat to the community and ties to family and employment.

Arraignment

The suspect makes his first court appearance at the arraignment. During arraignment, the judge reads the charges filed against the defendant in the complaint and the defendant chooses to plead "guilty," "not guilty" or "no contest" to those charges. The judge will also review the defendant's bail and set dates for future proceedings.

Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Proceedings

The government generally brings criminal charges in one of two ways: by a "bill of information" secured by a preliminary hearing or by grand jury indictment. In the federal system, cases must be brought by indictment. States, however, are free to use either process. Both preliminary hearings and grand juries are used to establish the existence of probable cause. If there is no finding of probable cause, a defendant will not be forced to stand trial.

A preliminary hearing, or preliminary examination, is an adversarial proceeding in which counsel questions witnesses and both parties makes arguments. The judge then makes the ultimate finding of probable cause. The grand jury, on the other hand, hears only from the prosecutor. The grand jury may call their own witnesses and request that further investigations be performed. The grand jury then decides whether sufficient evidence has been presented to indict the defendant.

Pre-Trial Motions

Pre-trial motions are brought by both the prosecution and the defense in order to resolve final issues and establish what evidence and testimony will be admissible at trial.

Trial

At trial, the judge or the jury will either find the defendant guilty or not guilty. The prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal trial. Thus, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crimes charged. The defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial in most criminal matters. A jury or judge makes the final determination of guilt or innocence after listening to opening and closing statements, examination and cross-examination of witnesses and jury instructions. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case will either be dismissed or a new jury will be chosen. If a judge or jury finds the defendant guilty, the court will sentence the defendant.

Sentencing

During the sentencing phase of a criminal case, the court determines the appropriate punishment for the convicted defendant. In determining a suitable sentence, the court will consider a number of factors, including the nature and severity of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, the defendant's personal circumstances and the degree of remorse felt by the defendant.

Appeal

An individual convicted of a crime may ask that his or her case be reviewed by a higher court. If that court finds an error in the case or the sentence imposed, the court may reverse the conviction or find that the case should be re-tried.

4 0
3 years ago
What have some departments done to eliminate unethical conduct by it's officers
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

In 2005, police misconduct in New Orleans had reached an all-time high. In the weeks before and after Hurricane Katrina, several high-profile beatings and unjustified shootings by police led to intense federal scrutiny of the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD), including a 2010 U.S. Department of Justice investigation and a 2013 federal consent decree to overhaul policies and promote greater transparency and more civilian oversight of the police force.

In 2017, the NOPD aspires to serve as a model for how to reduce police misconduct. Rather than standing silently by—or joining in on a fellow officer's brutality—New Orleans

6 0
3 years ago
How would congress check the power of a president who is discovered to be taking bribes?
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

The president can veto a law in the executive branch, but the legislature can override that veto with an adequate vote. The legislature has the power to approve presidential nominations, control budgets, impeach the president and remove him from office.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
After a person is charged with a crime, what is the next step in the criminal justice process?
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Explanation:

After being charged, the jury deliberates, the process of deciding whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty. During this process, no one associated with the trial can contact the jury without the judge and lawyers.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe three earlier types of corporal punishment used to correct offenders, and identify the goals of each.
    9·1 answer
  • Give the most space to ___*
    7·2 answers
  • Randi, a resident of Oregon, was involved in an auto accident while in Idaho. The other party lives in Wyoming. Randi wishes to
    12·1 answer
  • Jay is fired from his job and sues his employer. Jay loses the trial, and he appeals. The reviewing court affirms the decision o
    6·1 answer
  • 23. If a licensee fails to renew his/her license within_months of expiration, the licensee will be
    11·1 answer
  • When a company goes public, it begins doing what?
    13·1 answer
  • Is our CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM is fair? why or why not​
    9·1 answer
  • What is Confrontation under the Sixth Amendment?
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Explain which of the United Nations purposes you think is the most important.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!