1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pepsi [2]
3 years ago
7

A lawyer contacted by telephone a nationally-recognized malpractice defense attorney after being sued by a client for negligentl

y handling a case. The defense attorney, who had never worked for the lawyer before, agreed and immediately began handling the matter. The two met in person the next week to discuss details about the representation. During the conversation, the defense attorney stated the customary hourly fee and expense reimbursement policy. The lawyer felt the fee was high, but agreed to pay it. The defense attorney intended to follow up with a letter to document the conversation, but forgot to do so. The defense attorney continued to work on the matter for several months, and after it was successfully resolved, submitted a bill to the lawyer. The bill accurately reflecting the hourly fees and expenses, which were reasonable.
Did the defense attorney violate Rule 1.5?
A. Yes, because the hourly rate was not disclosed prior to commencement of the representation.
B. Yes, because the defense attorney did not document the conversation about fees and expenses in writing.
C. No, because the defense attorney successfully handled the representation.
D. No, because the defense disclosed the basis of her fee within a reasonable time after commencing the representation.
Law
1 answer:
ryzh [129]3 years ago
5 0
I may be wrong but I’m pretty sure it’s c
You might be interested in
The Power to interpret the law belongs to the Supreme Court and lower courts
Katarina [22]

Answer:when the verdict of a case is challenged and asked to be reviewed by a higher court it is called an appeal. The higher courts look for the evidence for the reason the defendant was guilty

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
If you were a defense attorney, what would you want the jurors to know about the limits of forensic evidence?
OlgaM077 [116]

The results indicate that the 10 pieces of evidence mock jurors reported would be most important when deciding a verdict are (in order of importance): (1) DNA, (2) fingerprints, (3) weapon, (4) video records, (5) crime-scene photos, (6) gunshot residue, (7) other bodily secretions, (8) video confession, (9) forensic ...

7 0
3 years ago
The full faith and credit clause of the constitution requires
Anna [14]

Answer: States within the United States of America to obey the laws and public acts other other states.

Explanation: The full faith and credit clause of the United States of America constitution is contained in Article four, section one. This clause requires the various United States of America to obey and respects the legal judgements,the public acts and records of other states of the Federation. The full faith and credit clause is essential to the survival and sustainance of the unity of the United States of America,as it helps to create unity and ensures that states help and support each other to effectively executive both criminal activities and other strategic Activities.

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone give ma an argument from the Tinker v. Des moines court case.
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

In a 7-2 choice, the Supreme Court's larger part ruled that not one or the other understudies nor instructors “shed their sacred rights to opportunity of discourse or expression at the school building gate.” The Court took the position that school authorities seem not deny as it were on the doubt that the discourse might disturb the learning

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What does Luca cause
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Luca cause earthquakes. I heard about luca

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Criminologists Richard Hawkins and Geoffrey Alpert Observe that the work of correctional officers is characterized by both
    7·1 answer
  • Is the grandfather clause still in effect for tobacco
    6·1 answer
  • What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case
    10·1 answer
  • What would happen if you fake a credit card number online on a website.
    11·1 answer
  • Need help?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
    12·1 answer
  • What are three arguments in made in the masterpiece cakeshop v. colorado civil rights commission?
    13·1 answer
  • So am I supposed to snap back to a streak snapback? Like I sent streaks to someone then they snap backed, so do I snap them back
    6·2 answers
  • Differentiate stare decisis from Eminent Domain
    11·1 answer
  • The State of California has decided to improve traffic safety. To do so, law makers look at a variety of options. These options
    7·1 answer
  • If you approach this intersection while driving do you or the pedestrian have the right away
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!