What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case

Law

1 answer:

Veseljchak [2.6K]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The Supreme Court ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless he has been informed of his right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything he says will be held against him in a court of law.

You might be interested in

How would a jury determine that a person had no control of themselves when they committed a crime?

Anna71 [15]

Answer:

I beleive the answer is C

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

What should an applicant do when completing an application

Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

Many things, including...

Explanation:

Read over the job application. ...

Use a professional name and email address. ...

Follow the instructions. ...

Tailor your cover letter to the job. ...

Include keywords in your resume. ...

Check your responses for errors. ...

Track your applications when applying for multiple jobs. ...

Tidy your social media profiles.

Upload resume...

Review before submitting.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Los derechos humanos y su relacion con otras disciplinas juridicas

shusha [124]

Algunos ejemplos de derechos humanos incluyen:
El derecho a la vida.
El derecho a la libertad y la libertad.
El derecho a la búsqueda de la felicidad.
El derecho a vivir una vida libre de discriminación.
El derecho a controlar lo que le sucede a su propio cuerpo y a tomar decisiones médicas por usted mismo.

7 0

3 years ago

How do the four seasons also<br> represent a cycle?

Aneli [31]

Because each year it goes through the same cycle of seasons
spring,summer,fall,winter,repeat
hope this helped

6 0

2 years ago

Which amendments limit the power of the federal government.

Artyom0805 [142]

Answer: The 10th Amendment

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago