1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Citrus2011 [14]
3 years ago
14

A franchise arrangement include a franchisor and franchisee with the franchisor..............to the franchisee

Business
1 answer:
MAVERICK [17]3 years ago
4 0

A franchise arrangement include a franchiser and franchisee with the franchiser terms and conditions to the franchisee.

<u>Explanation:</u>

A franchiser is the owner of any business and have an established trade mark. A franchisee is the one who will be paying royalty for using the Franchiser's brands and trademarks. There will be a contract agreement that exists in the franchising system. The agreement will contain two parties involved in it which is the franchiser and the franchise.

The agreement will also contain the terms and conditions of the franchiser to the franchise. The franchiser need to be obliged to these terms and conditions and when the violation of these terms and conditions happens then the franchiser has the power of taking legal actions as mentioned in the contract.

You might be interested in
According to purchasing-power parity, if it took 58 Indian rupees to buy a dollar today, but it took 55 to buy it a year ago, th
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

Given that,

Current exchange rate between India and U.S :

1 Dollar = Rs. 58

Exchange rate between India and U.S a year ago :

1 Dollar = Rs. 55

Above information conclude that the currency of India depreciates whereas  currency of united states appreciates.

This is due to the increase in the exchange rate in India. Now, a dollar become more expensive than it a year ago.

So, the Indian rupee depreciated and U.S dollar appreciated.

 

3 0
3 years ago
Winchell wrote a contract that involves two separate performance obligations. Winchell cannot estimate the stand-alone selling p
Semenov [28]

Given :

Stand alone price of product B = $100

Price of the combined product = $120

To Find :

Stand alone price of product A

Solution :

Now,

Stand alone price of Product A = 120 - 100 = $20

The allocation ration for the product A and B =

<u>Stand alone price of product A</u>

Stand alone price of product B

<u> </u><u> </u><u>20</u><u> </u><u> </u> = 1:5

100

Allocated to the performance obligation for delivering product A =

$120 x <u> </u><u> </u><u>1</u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u>

1+6

$17.1

So the answer is $ 17.1

Learn more about Transaction Price here:

brainly.com/question/25899244

#SPJ2

5 0
2 years ago
S&amp;L Financial buys and sells securities that it typically classifies as available-for-sale. On December 27, 2018, S&amp;L pu
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

2018 loss for 1,500

2019 gain for 4,000

Explanation:

purchase at 715,000

December 31th 713,500

adjusting entry december 31th

loss on investment          1,500 debit

    marketable securities                     1,500 credit

january 3rd, 2019

cash                                717,500 debit

     gain on investemnt                       4,000 credit

     martetable securities                 713,500 credit

to record gain on investment

6 0
3 years ago
From the end of 2010 to the end of 2011, M1 increased from $2,006 billion to $2,311 billion. By what percentage did M1 increase?
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

15.20%

Explanation:

The computation of the M1 increase is shown below:

= (M1 End of the year 2011  - M1 end of the year 2010) ÷ M1 End of the year 2010

= ($2,311 billion - $2,006 billion) ÷ ($2,006 billion)

= 15.20%

4 0
3 years ago
'As fewer people buy gym memberships, the demand for running shoes will decrease and the price of a pair of running shoes will i
olchik [2.2K]

Answer: "The rise in the price of a pair of running shoes will increase the supply of running shoes".

This statement is <u><em> false</em></u> because <em><u>a decrease in demand for running shoes does not increase the price of a pair of running shoes and an increase in the price of a pair of running shoes does not increase the supply of running shoes. </u></em>

This occurs as the price of a pair of running shoes increases,therefore decreasing the demand and thus the supply will not increase.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What role does politics play in shaping fiscal and monetary policies?
    14·1 answer
  • Current assets are economic resources that are expected to be converted to cash or used up by the business within one year or th
    14·1 answer
  • This problem has been solved!
    8·1 answer
  • When Wells Fargo employees fraudulently opened customer accounts in order to meet extremely high sales quotas, rehabilitating th
    15·1 answer
  • The special fund established by the legislature to help compensate victims of real estate licensee fraud is the: ____
    12·1 answer
  • What is the measure of how much consumers will respond to price changes?
    10·1 answer
  • For personal finance course
    12·1 answer
  • g If James's marginal and average costs is $8, and his firm is in a perfectly competitive industry, James's price is $_____ less
    9·1 answer
  • The gross profit margin is unchanged, but the net profit margin declined over the same period. This could have happened if A- Fr
    9·1 answer
  • Boi, why am i alive.-
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!