Solution:
Differential Analysis:
Continue Eliminate Net income
Inc/Dec
Sales 201000 0 -201000
variable cost 176000 0 176000
Contribution margin 25000 0 -25000
Fixed cost 30000 20300 9700
Net income / (loss) -5000 -20300 -15300
No, The Product line shall not be eliminated
Answer:
The estimate value of the subject property is $8,269,200
The other information that would be desirable in reaching a conclusion:
The closeness of the property to central business districts as the closer it is the higher the asking price.
The estimate was solely based on revenue, the applicable costs have been ignored.
The average taken might not be a good indication for the subject property because the property might have unique features
Explanation:
The formula for Gross Rent Multiplier is given Property Price / Gross Monthly Rental Income.
In determining the estimate value of the subject property ,we calculate the gross rent multiplier of the new property,then multiply it with the annual rental income.
In ascertaining the GRM of the new property we take the average GRM of the two similar properties in the same area.This is because the new property judging from number of units, lies in-between the other two properties.
GRM for Oaks
GRM=$9000000/($550*140)
GRM =116.88
GRM for Palms
GRM=$6,600,000/($650*90)
GRM =112.82
The average GRM=(116.88+112.82)/2
=114.85
Subject property price=114.85*(120*$600)
=$8,269,200
Answer: -0.5
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the price elasticity of demand will be calculated as follows:
= dQ/dP × P/Q
where,
dQ/dP = -1
P = 100
Q = 200 – P + 25 U – 50 P beer
Q = 200 - 100 + 25(8) - 50(2)
Q = 200 - 100 + 200 - 100
Q = 200
Therefore, dQ/dP × P/Q
= -1 × (100/200)
= -1 × 1/2
= -1 × 0.5
= -0.5
The price elasticity of demand is -0.5.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
