Answer:
correct option is d. accommodative
Explanation:
we know here that girl sell cookies at rita shop
but target not allow to sell cookies there
so we can say Shop Rite is here example of Accomodative
because Accomodative is willing to fitin with the someone need
and Not only Shop rita perform its ethical and social duties but it also accommodate other in their endeavor by going beyond above normal regulation
and here she give her place to sell there
so correct option is d. accommodative
Answer:
16.1%
Explanation:
According to CAPM :
expected return = risk free rate + ( beta x expected market return)
4.1% + (1.2 x 10%) = 16.1%
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
ISO 9000 is a certification program attesting that a factory, laboratory, or office has met the rigorous requirements set by the International Organization for Standardization.
Basically, the ISO 9000 is a tripartite continuous process that involves planning, controlling and documentation of quality in a business firm or organization.
This ultimately implies that, the ISO 9000 is a set of standards that typically guides an organization in ensuring that they meet both the stakeholders and consumer requirements or needs with respect to their products and services under statutory and regulatory requirements at a specific period of time.
Answer:
Explanation:
Under the 2002 law, states are required to test students in reading and math in grades 3–8 and once in high school. ... The major focus of No Child Left Behind is to close student achievement gaps by providing all children with a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
o Child Left Behind gives states and school districts the flexibility to use funds where they are needed most. ... NCLB also mandates that all teachers should be licensed to teach, hold at least a bachelors degree, and be highly qualified in the subject they are teaching.
Answer:
Permits will be the best option
Explanation:
Assuming the cost per ton of polution reduction follows a linear progression and it can reach zero
<u>The best option will be the permits:</u>
As Firm B will eliminate their polution and sale his permis to Firm A
That occur as Firm B is more efficient in doing this will sale to Firm A
In the end Firm A will have all the permits and continue to produce 200 tons
but Firm B will produce none achieving the goal of 50% reduction with the least economic impact.
This is a market solution which little intervention from the Gvernment
Cost to eliminate 200 polution with permits:
200 x $10 = 2,000
If we force each company to reduce pollution Firm A higher cost will create deadweight-loss
100 x $20 = 2,000
100 x $10 = <u> 1,000</u>
3,000