Answer:
<em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>c</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em>
<em>They made it easier to take away rights from nonwhites in the future.</em>
Explanation:
<em><u>h</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>p</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>p</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>!</u></em><em><u>!</u></em><em><u>!</u></em>
<span>Your answer is: February 20, 1967.
Hope this helps!
~Mistermistyeyed.</span>
Incomplete question. Here are the options;
a. Media intrusions into people's privacy threaten individual liberties.
b. An aggressive media serves as a check on the government's power.
c. Citizens need access to reliable news sources in order to be well informed.
d. Government ownership of news sources threatens freedom and democracy.
Answer:
<u>b. An aggressive media serves as a check on the government's power.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
We need to remember that the parties involved in this case are a media organization (New York Times) and the United States (New York Times v. the United States 1971).
By referring to the First Amendment the court sought to establish that freedom of speech should be respected in the country, thus, even an aggressive media such as the New York Times was acting as a check on the government's power, and that their actions were protected by the law.
Canada had put the military in charge
Soviet put their nuclear weapons on the coast lines
Canada didn't keep the treaty with America and didn't come to their help instead they put thief selfs on lockdown
Answer: It’s actually C
Explanation: I took the quiz and got them right
