Evidence 1: "Mars is the most likely planet for us to colonize"
Evidence 2: "The technology we would need to develop to send humans to Mars would directly benefit our economy here on Earth."
Evidence 3: "Studies have shown that radiation levels on Mars are not lethal to humans. Sure, we would have to live in a dome at first, but over time, we could use science to change the atmosphere and make it possible to go outside, just like on Earth!"
Source 2: Juniper Springs
Evidence 1: "...it is too dangerous. The atmosphere of the planet is more carbon dioxide than oxygen, and it’s very cold.
Evidence 2: "Also, going to Mars would be very expensive."
Evidence 3: "that does not mean they aren't dangerous." "It is foolish to think a dome would be able to protect us from all of the radiation."
Do i agree with the ideas presented? do i think the writing is interesting? do i like the essay? do i see that the writer tried to add style to the essay do i notice that the writer tries to engage readers?
One answer would be students find it difficult to relate to poems that were written long ago, Teachers use it with other works of literature may be one, and understanding the meaning and structure of a poem is challenging.
