1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jok3333 [9.3K]
3 years ago
10

What was the "planter ideal" how did it affect south carolina?

History
1 answer:
elena55 [62]3 years ago
5 0
Planter ideal is the idea that everyone in the southern states were aspired to become plantation owners.
This ideal cause <span>The lowcountry and backcountry were becoming more similar economically which considered a negative situation because their economy is too depended on one sector of the economy.</span>
You might be interested in
As a result of the collapse of roman rule in 476, what did western Europe experience ?
gregori [183]

<span>The </span>Fall of the Western Roman Empire<span> (commonly known as </span>Fall of the Roman Empire<span> or </span>Fall of Rome) was the period of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which it disintegrated and split into numerous successor states. By 476 CE, when Odoacer deposed the Emperor Romulus, the Western Roman Empire wielded negligible military, political, or financial power and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Invading "barbarians" had established their own polities on most of the area of the Western Empire. While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. 

4 0
2 years ago
What is Globalization?
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

the process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale.

Explanation:good luck

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Letter from Birmingham Jail Assignment
solniwko [45]

Answer:

Considering the context of its creation, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is remarkably restrained in tone. Throughout his career, many critics of Dr. King argued that he was too deferential to the white authorities that facilitated segregation and other racist policies, but the tone here seems to serve several purposes. First, it conforms to his ultimate purpose of justifying his cause as being in the name of justice. He does not wish to validate his audience’s deep-seeded fears - that the black movement is an extremist set that will engender violence. Therefore, by utilizing restraint, he earns a sympathetic ear to which he then declares his proud embrace of extremism and tension. His difficult arguments end up practically unimpeachable precisely because he has presented them through logos as well as through pathos. However, the restraint also allows him to reinforce one of the letter’s central themes, the interconnectedness of man. There are times when he distinguishes himself and his cause from that of his opponents, particularly in terms of race. However, he for the most part suggests that all men are responsible for all others, an idea that would not be as effective if the tone of the argument was too fiery and confrontational.

Explanation:

Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.

In Dr. King’s argument, moderation is a reflection of the moderate’s ignorant and unwitting sinfulness. In terms of the former, the white moderate operates under an illusion that patience will be more effective towards ending segregation than tension will be. Through a variety of legally-structured arguments, Dr. King illustrates the fallacy of both these assumptions. He argues that moderation is but a handy disguise for cowards who fear upsetting the status quo more than desire to pursue justice. However, because he stipulates that his audience is ostensibly interested in the virtue of justice, he argues that moderation allows them license to live in a sinfulness of inaction. To view the suffering of others but to remain silent facilitates a world where men are “separate,” which he equates with sinfulness. Through a variety of unambiguous comparisons – the just crusader to Jesus, and the moderates to those who did not protect the Jews of Nazi Germany – Dr. King decries moderation as the largest obstacle towards equal rights in America at the time.

One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does it mean when a historian uses chronological thinking to study history?
love history [14]
Chronological thinking is the foundation of historical reasoning—the ability to examine relationships among historical events and to explain historical causality
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help i am very lost.
Crank

The first three boxes going vertically go in the last box and the remaining split into the first one, leaving the 7th and 6th going to the middle one.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the 1790s, Spain stopped funding the Texas missions because they wanted the churches to support themselves
    12·2 answers
  • How did the wartime experiences of African Americans contribute to the drive for greater civil rights after the war?
    14·1 answer
  • The Western Church claimed authority over the Eastern Church because the Pope
    9·1 answer
  • Rosa Parks was a significant figure in the civil rights movementfor for which of the following reasons?
    5·1 answer
  • How dose the internet affect the way people find and exange information
    10·2 answers
  • Why is it helpful to make mental notes during a formal discussion?
    6·2 answers
  • What <br> is the name for the document that describes how a city government should operate?
    6·1 answer
  • What geographic factor influenced the changing political borders in the Indus River Valley? HURRY
    6·2 answers
  • According to cesaire Hughes and padmore what are some of the relationships between fascism and colonialism (2-3 paragraphs)
    7·1 answer
  • The Homestead Act contributed to conflict between white Americans and American Indians by: A. encouraging white settlers to relo
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!