1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ira [324]
3 years ago
7

If science is proven wrong in the worlds eyes, would we have to believe god is real then?

History
2 answers:
Inessa05 [86]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: well i say yes

Explanation: because scientist say that the big bang was the one that did the world galaxy and everything else but if you see explosion now it destroys not create new things so there suppose to be a god on the real world and even though we go higher in the sky we can't see him but he could see us

hope this help

Yanka [14]3 years ago
5 0

The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.

You might be interested in
Who was the first president with irish ancestry?
melomori [17]

Andrew Jackson

Andrew Jackson was the 7th US President and the first to claim Irish ancestry, holding office from 1829 – 1837.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain to me about the causes of the Civil War. (Be sure to discuss differences in views of federalism, including tariffs, and
Virty [35]

Answer:

Explore articles from the History Net archives about Civil War Causes

» See all Civil War Causes Articles

The Northern and Southern sections of the United States developed along different lines. The South remained a predominantly agrarian economy while the North became more and more industrialized. Different social cultures and political beliefs developed. All of this led to disagreements on issues such as taxes, tariffs and internal improvements as well as states rights versus federal rights.

Slavery

The burning issue that led to the disruption of the union was the debate over the future of slavery. That dispute led to secession, and secession brought about a war in which the Northern and Western states and territories fought to preserve the Union, and the South fought to establish Southern independence as a new confederation of states under its own constitution.

The agrarian South utilized slaves to tend its large plantations and perform other duties. On the eve of the Civil War, some 4 million Africans and their descendants toiled as slave laborers in the South. Slavery was interwoven into the Southern economy even though only a relatively small portion of the population actually owned slaves. Slaves could be rented or traded or sold to pay debts. Ownership of more than a handful of slaves bestowed respect and contributed to social position, and slaves, as the property of individuals and businesses, represented the largest portion of the region’s personal and corporate wealth, as cotton and land prices declined and the price of slaves soared.

The states of the North, meanwhile, one by one had gradually abolished slavery. A steady flow of immigrants, especially from Ireland and Germany during the potato famine of the 1840s and 1850s, insured the North a ready pool of laborers, many of whom could be hired at low wages, diminishing the need to cling to the institution of slavery.

plz mark me as brainlist

5 0
3 years ago
Select all that apply. What upset the sepoys during the British East India Company's rule of India? A. They were paid less than
Flauer [41]
"<span>C. British tea was being imported into India" is correct, although there were also issues with pay. These issues weren't as much of an issue as the British importation, however. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
whom do the two men seated at the table represent what this cartoon suggest about american attitudes toward immigration in the l
laiz [17]
You didn't show a cartoon
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the items that match Aristotle's definitions of governments.
ioda
I think the correct answers from the choices are options first and the last option. Aristotle's definition of governments would be rule by a few called an aristocracy and rule by many called a democracy. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the push and pull factors for immigrants coming to each region of English colonies?
    13·1 answer
  • What inspired franklin to create the cartoon join or die
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a motivation for most Christians to fight in the Crusades?
    8·1 answer
  • 23. Which of these periods in U.S. History occurred first?
    5·1 answer
  • Sacred texts that recorded Aaron hymns stories poems and prayers
    15·1 answer
  • What was the icemans ax made of
    6·2 answers
  • Pls anyone help me pls
    14·1 answer
  • HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • The Senators or Representatives were not to hold any other ___ while they were members.
    12·1 answer
  • When were dinasours alive
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!