This excerpt doesn't tell us that Ophelia's words are disregarded in the play. It only tells us that the Gentleman wants to disregard them, as well as all the parties involved in her breakdown as a character, including Gertrude, Claudius, and Hamlet himself. By achieving this kind of conflict between Ophelia's words and the way others perceive/disregard them, Shakespeare wants to convey the fact that Ophelia has been used for other people's purposes. Hamlet used her as a part of his ploy; her own father and brother used her to suit their own interests as well. She is merely a puppet of other people's plans; but her character is so much more than that, and that's why she goes mad. She just can't bear the amount of negligence she endures - and not because she is a fragile person (being a woman), but because she just wants to be treated equally. Polonius warns her that Hamlet would use her, but he also does precisely that - uses her for his own purpose, forbidding her to continue the relationship.
In contemporary culture, women's words have become louder, but it doesn't mean they are heard and understood properly. Women have to invest twice as much effort as men if they want not to be disregarded as the "fairer sex" (to use a phrase from Shakespeare's time, which has survived to this day), or as individuals who have nothing important to say. Even in many political campaigns that propagate themselves to protect women's rights, women are used as a tool for different purposes - popularization of one political option or another. Although women have been fighting for more than two centuries for their right to be treated equally, the fight isn't nearly over.
Answer:
B- She hoped to become more famous than male pilots of her time.
Explanation:
that is the whole point of her life
Looking like a zealous Party member, she wears an (ironic) Anti-Sex sash around her waist, and always participates passionately during the Two Minutes Hate. Julia's other side is much more interesting. ... Winston would sure like it to be the former, and Julia does suggest that her acts are her own small rebellion.
I think that there's definitely some physical attraction. And I think that they were excited by the illicit thrill they got of working against the party together, and that declaring themselves to be in love was another way to foster that rebellion. But honestly I feel like it really all feels more like the kind of teenage romance you get where partners are selected as much out of a desire for rebellion as they are out of any kind of compatibility.
Now, that doesn't mean that they couldn't have really loved each other. It's possible that the limited social (and literal) vocabulary both had just prevented them from demonstrating that their love was on par with that we might see from a pair of mature adults today. But it's enough of a gray area to muddy the analysis. While I personally would argue in favor of the "teenagers enjoying the thrill of sneaking out to have sex behind their parents' back" model, I can definitely see the other side as well. In the end, it's up to you to decide which perspective makes the most sense to you.
https://www.quora.com/How-do-Julia-and-Winston-feel-about-each-other-in-the-novel-1984
Option C) is correct. For example, Where can I buy man-cave accessories?
