All categories

2 years ago

I really need this ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!! Did America have the right to revolt against Great Britain?????

History

2 answers:

NARA [144]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The

King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the

colonies. They decided to require several kinds of taxes from the

colonists to help pay for the French and Indian War. These taxes

included the Stamp Act, passed in 1765, which required the use

of special paper bearing an embossed tax stamp for all legal

documents. Other laws, such as the Townsend Acts, passed in

1767, required the colonists to pay taxes on imported goods like

tea. Many colonists felt that they should not pay these taxes,

because they were passed in England by Parliament, not by their

own colonial governments. They protested, saying that these

taxes violated their rights as British citizens.

andrezito [222]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Both natural law and English constitutional doctrine gave the colonists a right to revolt against the sovereign's oppression." But these understandings about the right of revolution on the eve of the American Revolution rested on a traditional model of government.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

By 1838, Andrew Jackson's policy toward American Indians resulted in the

Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

A. The Indian Removal Act

5 0

2 years ago

Imagine you are on a committee studying whether or not to make changes to the Electoral College system. What would you recommend

Anestetic [448]

Answer:

Following are the answer to this question:

Explanation:

I will completely change the voting system with no doubt because there is no doubt in eliminates it. I'm 18, and in my short life, I have also seen a three basic right in elections, in which the national election was managed to win by the selected candidate.

The peoples voting by their will in the elections, in which the common election was lost and a presidential candidate was appointed. This same electoral college can, by its free will, oppose the person's, in which people will appoint a nonethical president, especially unethical in a country that values the freedom to vote and to change so enormously.
If the United States does not have the right to vote, it's also essentially free to take a voting booth and voice an opinion that perhaps the voting in the voting of the participating universities is might or may not differ.

5 0

2 years ago

Many who live in or visit california are aware of names such as pico boulevard, pico park, or pico rivera. the list of names ser

Alexxandr [17]

The passage shows that Californian politics, and in particular, political advancement methods, were not wholly bound by law as they are now.

Governmental institutions and government control was weaker at that time, so it was difficult to enforce the law consistently. Because of it, people did not have a strong commitment to following legal paths for advancement. Revolutions and rebellions were more effective in seizing power than political campaigns, and there were few negative repercussions for those who chose that method.

3 0

2 years ago

For what good did Egypt largely trade?

evablogger [386]

One major trade Egypt consisted of was Wheat.

3 0

2 years ago

The darkened area in the map shows one of the nations which joined the United States in the Normandy Invasion of 1944. This nati

musickatia [10]

<span>The darkened area in the map shows one of the nations which joined the United States in the Normandy Invasion of 1944. This nation is the</span> D. United Kingdom.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers