Answer:
Wallach describes three ways of thinking :
- T<u>ransgenerational thinking</u>: It helps us to think about our problems and the ways in which you can resolve them ,and what will be the future consequence of your thinking.
- <u>Futures thinking:</u> Wallach advocated the fact that we should just not think about the future in one single perspective rather we should open our mind about various future perspectives.
- <u>Telos thinking:</u>The word Telos comes from a greek word which means :Ultimate aim".One should think that what will happen next once a particular problem is solved
Wallach relate the future to a part of speech establishing a link between Thomas Khun quote: “People don’t shift unless they have a vision of what it is they’re shifting to.” and Martin Luther King Speech of "I Have a Dream" he says that that speech is successful as it shows what his dream and what will come after the dream is accomplished
Answer: False these are the things that draw in customers if they have good rates they would be happy to tell you.
Answer:
b. 253,589
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows,
Present value of lease payment = $3,335,888
Payment in 2021 = $800,000
Interest rate = 10%
So, we can calculate the interest expense by using following formula,
Interest expense = (Present value of lease payment - Payment in 2021 ) × interest rate
Interest expense = ($3,335,888 - $800,000) × 10%
= $2,535,888 × 10%
= $253,588.8 or $253,589
In 2021, Pine should record interest expense of $253,589
Is this a true or false question if so its true if not can you give me possibility anwsers <span />
Answer:
1. $3.20 x 2.20 = $7.04
2. It will be favorable.
3. It will be unfavorable.
4. Direct material price variance = $22
Direct material quantity variance = 0.48
Explanation:
1. Standard direct cost per unit=cost of direct materials price x direct material standard quantity per unit.
2. It will be favorable because they expected or had budgeted to pay $3.60 per foot for the material but the actual cost became $3.20. So they pay $0.40 less than they had expected to pay.
3. It will be unfavorable because they had planed or budgeted for each unit to use 2.05 feet of leather but they ended up needing 2.20 feet of leather per collar so that means they under budgeted by 0.15 feet.
4. Direct material price variance =( $3.60 x 55) less ($3.20x55)=$22
The total amount that was budgeted or expected to be paid is subtracted from the total actual price that was paid.
Direct material quantity variance = (2.05x$3.20) less (2.20x$3.20)= -0.48
The total direct material quantity that is used is subtracted from the quantity that was expected to be used.
