Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer:
B) Norming
Explanation:
Analyzing the scenario above, it is possible to state that Wren and Zola are in the team development norming stage.
At this stage, there is an increase in the identification of the role of each member and their goal in a team. There is a decrease in previous conflicts and an increase in group identity, which helps to develop tasks more effectively and jointly, where each member has a well-defined responsibility and the leader has the essential role of regulating the group and assisting in the development the responsibilities of each one, which will lead to effectiveness in achieving the team's objectives.
Answer:
$3,849.87
Explanation:
The change in balance is the net of the receipts and the payments.
The receipts include the receivables and the interest paid by the bank while the payments include the outgoing expenditure and bank charge.
Balance change
= $16,590 - $12,730 -$12.50 + $2.37
= $3,849.87
Answer:
b. producers are more willing and able to hire that resource
Explanation:
In production resources are defines as various inputs in the production process of a product.
It contributes to the final product that a consumer buys and they have their various costs which are used to obtain their use.
So when the price of a resource decreases, it means that the cost of production also decreases.
There is now more outlay of cash that can be used hire that resource.
Producers are able to produce more of the final product so supply increases.