Italians states like venice and florence were offically republics .

1 answer:

4 0

For the answer to the question above asking Italians states like Venice and Florence were officially republics .
In what sense were they republics in name only?
My answer would be since the Venetians were gentlemen in name rather than reality.
It could be argued that Italians states like Venice and Florence were republics in name only because they were in fact ruled by a wealthy class of citizens, and in order for a state to be a true republic it must be government by individuals who are fairly elected by the citizens.

You might be interested in

How is the power of institutions decided

Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

bnb

Explanation:

vhjhjjn.&jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjhcfun vjjk

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In which part of Africa do you think groups had the best opportunities to trade by sea

Aneli [31]

Kingston Africa is probably the best place to have trading by sea. Nearly all coastal towns are ideal. !

7 0

3 years ago

In what way is ethnocentrism functional? a. People disparage those with differing attitudes as inferior or backward. b. It gener

Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

e. It encourages intergroup understanding and cooperation.

Explanation:

Ethnocentrism refers to an attitude in which a particular culture believes that its own values and traditions are superior to those of other cultures. This can lead to contempt, misundertanding and even hate of outsiders. However, one of its positive effects is that it can create greater understanding, identification and cooperation among members of the same cultural group.

6 0

2 years ago

Somebody pls help with 4 and 5

Sophie [7]

Answer:

4 is a

5 is b

Explanation:

a primary source is someone who was there at the time but a secondary source is someone who wasn't.

hope that helps!xx

5 0

2 years ago

Milton Friedman discussed the possibility of setting the marginal social cost of printing one more unit of money to zero, implyi

Ugo [173]

Answer and Explanation:

Phelps criticized Friedman's position, because he said it was totally irrelevant to analyze the tax functions of inflation without assessing product demand, as Friedman suggested in his theory. He stated that this would only be possible if there was a way to predict an optimal rate of inflation in different situations of demand and supply, otherwise, in Phelps' words it would be the same as "Professor Friedman gave us Hamlet without a prince".

Phelps' positioning would be better considered by the RBC model, since this model is based on real and not imaginary facts.

8 0

2 years ago