All categories

3 years ago

Why would economic growth be important to maintaining national strength?

Business

2 answers:

never [62]3 years ago

5 0

D. Economic growth creates the wealth that pays for defense and future investments.

Sonja [21]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

D. Economic growth creates the wealth that pays for defense and future investments.

Explanation:

Economic growth is important for the development of all sectors of a nation, especially those sectors that demand high amounts of public investment, such as the national strength.In crisis situations, the government needs to cut spending and state defense sectors such as the military are often affected. Instead, as the nation thrives economically, more investment can be made for national defense through security forces. These investments consist of new technologies, equipment, supplies, and spending on training forces and all that is necessary for national security to be guaranteed.

You might be interested in

The formula to compute cash receipts or cash payments for operating cash flows using the direct method is?

labwork [276]

Answer:

[>>>>>>>..............................

8 0

2 years ago

Ivan has plenty of money to invest but so far has bought high-risk securities. Explain how Ivan could diversify and whether it i

Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

Its important to diversify because it can help an investor manage risk and reduce the volatility of an asset's price movements. If his high risk investment backfires hes left with almost nothing, diversifying can give him a safety blanket just incase. The many ways he can diversify include, but aren't limited to, Use asset allocation or target date funds, Invest in a mix of mutual funds or ETFs, Customize with individual stocks and bonds, Vary company size and type, Invest abroad, and add complexity.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following sentences with internal sentence interrupters use correct punctuation? Check all that apply. The VP of fi

Flura [38]

Answer:

The correct answer is The VP of finance, not the CFO, works with the departmental managers to develop internal budgets. and Our graduates, having had two full semesters of workplace communication, always do well in the job market.

Explanation:

We use the sentence interruoters to indicate information that is not relevant to the sentence. This information, not being important, must be separated by two commas.

What is inside the comma should not interfere with the final meaning of the sentence and its understanding. We could remove that part and the sentence should continue to make sense.

In this case we have the following sentences:

The VP of finance, not the CFO, works with the departmental managers to develop internal budgets.

Our graduates, having had two full semesters of workplace communication, always do well in the job market.

Let's see what happens if we remove what is located between the commas:

The VP of finance works with the departmental managers to develop internal budgets. 

Our graduates always do well in the job market. 

As we can see, both sentences still make sense, which indicates that this information was not relevant and was well punctuated by being located between two commas.

8 0

4 years ago

Walter is a chemistry teacher who earns $50,000 per year, while Jesse is unemployed. Both Walter and Jesse want to go back to sc

katrin2010 [14]

Answer:

No, their economic cost of enrolling in the business program is not the same for both,

Explanation:

The explicit costs of going back to college are the same for Walter and Jesse, e.g. they might be $20,000 per year, or even $30,000 doesn't matter for this analysis. But Walter is currently working as a teacher and that means taht if he decides to go to college, his implicit costs will include the forgone salary as a teacher which is $50,000 per year. Implicit costs are opportunity costs, i.e. additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment instead of another alternative.

Since Jesse is not working, whether she goes back to college or not will not affect her income, it will still be $0, but if Walter goes back to college he will lose his salary.

6 0

3 years ago

Company X has 2 million shares of common stock outstanding with a book value of $2 per share. The stock trades for $3 per share.

gladu [14]

Answer:

23.08%

Explanation:

The computation of the debt ratio is shown below:

Debt amount

= 2 million × 0.90

= 1.80 million

And,

Equity amount

= 2 million × 3

= 6 million

Now

debt ratio = debt amount ÷ (amount of debt + amount of equity)

= 1.80 million ÷ ( 6 million + 1.80 million)

= 23.08%

4 0

3 years ago