Answer:
"By providing colonial governments with the raw materials needed to sustain industrialization in Europe "
Explanation:
I know this is correct because I received a 2/2 or a 100% on this section of the test. I took a screenshot of this for further evidence. If brainly takes down all of my answers again this site is corrupt.
Answer:
Scientific inquiry is what differentiate history from myths, and popular folk tales.
Explanation:
History refers to the empirical study of past events and the most important thing is the right approach while reconstructing the past phenomenons else one tends to end at the wrong conclusion. While studying history researchers not only look for sources but also critically examined the socio-political situation in which the source was created. And therefore one needs to apply scientific methods to cross-examine different historical sources before reaching a conclusion.
<span>Answer:
A general's win-loss record is only one thing to ponder upon. There are other factors. One is the competency of the opposition. So a lackluster general may fight an even worse general and end up looking good by winning. Weather may be a factor. A good general with a good plan may still lose because of bad weather. Good generals with good
plans may be defeated may be defeated
by an army with better weapons.
There's also reputation to consider.
Grant fought and won more than he
lost. Other generals still complained to
Lincoln about him saying he drank. Lincoln stayed with him saying he was needed because he fought. Lee may have been a better general than Grant but he did not have as many men and his men were poorly fed and supplies were inadequate.</span>
james Otis about 1761 in amarica over the britsh paldemant
They wanted a fascist government
