Answer:
B
note: in most cases (6x-3)
would be the way people simplify this
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 2. It is likely that a confounding variable could be a contributing explanation for the difference between these two groups.
3. This is an observational study, not an experiment.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the information given, the statement that's true include:
• It is likely that a confounding variable could be a contributing explanation for the difference between these two groups.
• This is an observational study, not an experiment.
It is an observational study as the researcher observed just observed the scenarios without him trying to change the people that are being exposed to it or controlling it.
Therefore, the correct options are II and III only.
Answer:
378 sq feet
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is D.
The shaded region has points less than the line and the y intercept is -4.
1. If Rachel's free-throw percentage is 60%, you can take 4 index cards away since 100 - 40 = 60%. For example, if those 10 index cards represent 10 free-throws, and her percentage is 60%, just take 60 away from the total (100%).
2. For the simulation, it's the same as problem 1. Since 50 is the total amount of shots she is going to take, and you know she is going make 60% of them, take 60% from 50 which gives you 30. That means she will make 30 of them and miss 20 of them
I hoped I helped
X8lue83rryX
