Here we go..
These questions deal with opinion and perspective supplied by facts, so if this is purely academic there is no perfect answer. In my opinion, yes imperial rule has always been bad. There are positive things about empires, that is what makes them interesting. There are pros and cons, but often that not (speaking in both modern and recent times) the pros are supposed to blot out the cons. The Roman Empire is an ancient example, so yeah those pros weren't mean to blot out the cons. Never forget this, most pros of the imperial government are to make 'managing' easier. If the people dont want to be ruled by a foreign power, then youll get what you always have. Riots and whatnot. Ha, flip open any area of a text book and youll find the answer to "What is a lot or half the people dont want the imperialism?" Listen, there is no such thing as a completely good anything. But also, never let that be an excuse for injustice. Whether or not you judge yours or someone elses empire as good depends on you really, how you feel what you want, your morals. And if you want specific examples - I have plenty. But I am tired of typing now so if you want examples just msg me. Hope I helped
transition:
Write what you think about this Mayan civilization
answer:
The Maya are probably the best-known of the classical civilizations of Mesoamerica. Originating in the Yucatán around 2600 B.C., they rose to prominence around A.D. 250 in present-day southern Mexico, Guatemala, northern Belize and western Honduras.
Los mayas son probablemente las más conocidas de las civilizaciones clásicas de Mesoamérica. Originarios de Yucatán alrededor del 2600 a.C., se destacaron alrededor del 250 d.C. en el actual sur de México, Guatemala, el norte de Belice y el oeste de Honduras.
Adams was a Federalist, or strong Federal Government. Jefferson was an anti Federalist, or states rights. But Jefferson did practice federalism policies during his term. Adams never owned slaves and his parents were deeply opposed to slavery.
The main role which an administrative law judge can play is to:
- B. can gather evidence and take testimony.
<h3>Who is an Administrative Judge?</h3>
This refers to a government employee who is in charge of overseeing the cases which involves agencies administration and sometimes have a similar role to that of a trial judge when dealing with civil suits.
With this in mind, we can see that the main role of an administrative law judge is to gather evidence, give oaths, rules on objections which is occupied in option B.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B
Read more about judges here:
brainly.com/question/2533637
what are the answer choice
