Answer:
species egalitarianism or non egalitarianism
Explanation:
Species Egalitarianism refers to the view that all species have equal rights , value, and whether all species should be treated in the same standard.
People who support species egalitarianism believe that all species have equal rights while nonegalitarianists belie otherwise.
Nonegalitarianist often pointed out to the way animals behave in order to prove their point. When we let nature take it course, animals eventually go and kill one another in order to survive. With this, the idea that humans should treat animals in equal manners as other humans can be seen as extremely ridiculous
In 1875 the United States solidified its commitment to the development of the internationally recognized metric system by becoming one of the original seventeen signatory nations to the Metre Convention, also known as the Treaty of the Metre.
Perception in most cases is subjective, irrational, and marred with error. Examples to support the notion are given below:
- Some individuals argue that atoms don't exist because they are not visible
- Some argue that there is no God because He is not visible
- Some argue that there is no carbon monoxide in a room and even if there is, it cannot be smelt.
<h3>What is Perception?</h3>
Perception is a careful organization, identification, and interpretation of information in order to understand the presented information. It is what an individual thinks or feels about a piece of information or something else.
Some perceptions can be filled with flaws and in most cases are subjective and irrational. Even though on the surface it might feel like its true but it is actually the opposite.
Learn more about Perception here:
brainly.com/question/1838569
Answer:
The statement that best describes the idea of manifest destiny that was used in the 19th century would be that "it was fate that the united states would continue to expand westward," since people thought the US was "destined" to do so.
The correct answer is C. Both empires were divided into smaller city states and each of those was governed by a king. In the Mayan Empire the royal family exercised a lot more power thanin the Aztec and this could be said to come close to oligarchy but in essence both empires were closer to a monarchy.
