Answer:
The author point out the ability of human beings to have feelings for each other through empathy which inturn create altruistic human behavior.
Explanation:
Empathy result in having compassion and understanding feelings of people who are afflicted and it's encourage others to render help. Empathy is a motivator of altruism. Altruism is a person's ego who has problems and anxieties and go out to render help to others who need it. Altruism born out of empathy is the true altruism because it is the desire to help people who are afflicted.
Unclear question, but I infer you are referring to a passage that isn't mentioned.
Answer:
e. Personification
Explanation:
Based on the context which referred to abstract objects; time and care, the author seems to be personifying 'Time'.
Note that Personification is a type of figure of speech that attributes or refers to something that is not a person as though it were.
One common example is "Have you seen my car? Isn't she beautiful?". We noticed the car is spoken as though it were a person.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Plot Event because the plot is the theme or the lesson.
Answer:
Nietzsche’s philosophical thoughts on morality argue that a moral code is not in our nature, while
Zimbardo’s argument is that we shouldn’t expect our decisions to be
influenced by morality alone. Nietzsche’s thoughts on morality are
grounded in opposition to Christianity. He begins his argument by
quoting from the Bible, “If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out,” before
labeling the Christian idea as “stupidity” (Paragraph 1). Nietzsche argues
that sensuality is in opposition to Christianity and that the church
“always wanted the destruction of its enemies; we, we immoralists and
Antichristians” (Paragraph 5), adding that “Life has come to an end
where the ‘kingdom of God’ begins” (Paragraph 8). In contrast, Zimbardo
bases his argument on science and proposes that the electric shock
experiment by psychologist Stanley Milgram “provides several lessons
about how situations can foster evil” (Paragraph 5). He also uses
conclusions from a 1974 experiment by Harvard anthropologist John
Watson, as well as his own simulated jail experiment, the 1971 Stanford
Prison Experiment, to help support his argument.
