The ancient society that observed monotheism, belief in only one god is option b) Jews.
The Jews have been believing that the supreme power is only one and hence have been practicing monotheism. They have been long since ages followed this tradition along with Islam, Christianity, Judaism etc.
Monotheism is the tradition of believing one god or one power different from that of polytheism. However, it is not the oneness but the uniqueness that counts in monotheism. Many at times it is considered as just numbers, as one god vs many gods or goddess. This it oversimplified and is mistaken often by people.
To know more about monotheism visit:
brainly.com/question/28855446
#SPJ4
Answer:
appropriate
Explanation:
Irene had an appropriate death. She resolved all the things that were pending in her life, accepted that death comes for all and move on with no weight in conscience or remorse, until the end of her life. For this reason, he took the initiative to make peace with his sister, take control of his remaining time, and face death appropriately and honorably. Only then could she truly rest in peace.
Its been awhile since i learned this, but i do remember 1 cause
The U.S. provided support for the French since the French helped the U.S. during the US revolution away from Britain. I hope someone else can help you with 2 more!
The question asks, "What is YOUR philosophy?" I can't really tell you what YOU should think ... but I can present for you the ideas of a couple different political philosophers who took opposing stands on the issue.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both English philosophers who wrote during the 17th century.
Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan </em>in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). The people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. That was Hobbes' view.
John Locke famously published <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690. According to Locke's view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government. </em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em> Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property. Locke always favored the people remaining in charge, and asserted that the people have the power to change their government and remove government leaders if the government is not properly serving the needs and well-being of the people.
As you write your own answer to this question for your class, you will want to decide, perhaps, if you agree more with Hobbes, that security and stability are most important ... or with Locke, that the authority and liberty of the people are always paramount.
One example would be that it makes it easier to calculate very long numbers like understanding
How many zeros are in 3000000000000 would be more complex than just writing it as 3x10^12
