Answer:
The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.
Explanation:
The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.
<u>The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South.</u> For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,
Answer:
your answer is D, The people choose the old man as chief.
Explanation:
hope this helped
Answer:
D). Protestants.
Explanation:
The people who immigrated to Texas from different continents belonged to three main religious groups i.e. 'Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.' <u>The majority of them were Catholic Christians who migrated to Texas from Europe. Even the ones who were protestants before migrating to Texas converted to Catholicism as then only they could be granted citizenship of Mexico</u>. <u>Therefore, the texas immigrant population included Catholic Christians, Muslims, and Jews</u> as the Protestant population was already very less and that too got their faith converted. Hence, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
One of things that was used to justify the caste system was "<span>aryan supremacy", since many of the people who were at the "bottom end" of the system were subjugated to racist policies. </span>
I have just spent two days in Barcelona, one of the most densely populated urban settlements in the world. There are 103 road intersections per sq km – high compared to Brasilia’s 41 or Shanghai’s Pudong area, which has only 17. Yet despite these high densities, residents of Barcelona will tell you how profoundly liveable their city is.
