Question

Suppose you have read two different books on World War II, and each book has different arguments about how the war started. Which of the following best describes the stronger historical argument?

Answer 1

Answer:

B. The argument with the most reliable cited sources

Explanation:

This gives you the ability to clear through biased or untrue information almost 100% of the time. whenever needing to look into historical events always try to get information with a stable footing, i.e; First-hand experience or multiple well-cited sources. Hope this helps :)

possible answers

A. The argument that was written most recently B. The argument with the most reliable cited sources C. The argument that does not use any electronic sources D. The argument that has the most sources