I believe the correct answer here is B. me; object of a preposition. We can see that between is a preposition, so everything after it becomes a prepositional phrase.
The answer is that it was based on the belief that segregation was permissible as long as the facilities were equal. This is the reason why the Supreme Court’s ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson was problematic.
Answer:
I think the answer is C
Explanation:
because the second sentence is give you information about the info in sentence one
Answer:
E). The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members.
Explanation:
As per the question, option E displays the assumption 'the Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members' on which the argument lies as it is rightly assumed by logic. This assumption clearly justifies the conclusion 'lesser affluent families receiving a fee reduction' aptly. The other options fail to validate the conclusion as it offers an illogical yet inappropriate claim. Therefore, <u>option E</u> is the correct answer as it reasonably justifies the claim/argument.
Smoking, littering, driving cars, not recycling
