Option C
The peer review process, in which scientists submit write-ups of their ideas and experiments to a set of colleagues who judge how good the ideas are before the ideas can be published, is: A useful and important, even if imperfect, mechanism of quality-control for the scientific literature
<u>Explanation:</u>
The peer-review practice endures to approve scholarly work, accommodates to enhance the worth of proclaimed research, and builds networking circumstances in research areas. Notwithstanding critiques, peer review is yet the unique internationally affirmed system for research validation.
Peer review guarantees that documents undergo a fair evaluation and skillful opinion, enabling scholars to develop their script and therefore high-quality experimental interpretation and articles to be proclaimed. It also encourages the browsers to believe the scientific uprightness of the report and to present notified declarations where peer reviewer comments are ready.
Based on the given statement above and if you will try to make a diagram on it, the reason that would justify saying that AL= BE is the last option: CPCTE or <span>Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Equal. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for. </span>
Answer:
Primary appraisal
Explanation:
Primary appraisal is a phenomenon that describes how much the events are significant for a person. The primary could be a threat or it can be an appraisal. The appraisal can be a different type. It can be in the form of perception, cognition, promotion, apprentice.
It is an appraisal through which a person would assign a name or task of an event that occurs with a person. During this process, a person analyses how much the appraisal or event is relevant to him. Internal and external attitude will define the event occurrence with a person. It is a wide area of cognitive appraisal that was proposed by Lazarus and Folk man.
