1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DanielleElmas [232]
4 years ago
9

(03.04 MC) Question refers to the excerpt below. "If Northerners found the three-fifths rule and slavery wrong, Southerners were

perfectly willing to drive home the logic of emancipation: Emancipate them and they stay where they are; and two-fifths of their number will be added to the representation, though they are not permitted to enlist in our army."猶rofessor Margo Anderson, 2003 What concern of Northerners did the Southerners use in this argumen
History
1 answer:
Oksana_A [137]4 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is: Representation in Congress.

Explanation:

The Southern states based their economy on slavery while the Northern states were free states, with bigger population due to the industrialization so their Representation in Congress was a big issue.

Debates of Missouri being admitted as a part of the Union after the Louisiana's Purchase generated two different opinions. <u>That Missouri should be admitted as a free state because the Northern states were free states and were against slavery and that Missouri should be admitted as a slave state because every state should be able to make their own laws and decide if they wanted to have slaves or not. </u>

<em>Southern states supported Missouri's decision of being a slave state</em>, so they argued that <u>The Three-Fifths Compromise stated that 3 out of every 5 slaves were to be counted in order to establish representation in Congress</u>, so if they were admitted as a slave state they would have less representation in Congress than they would have being a free state. Southern states also argued that African Americans in Northern states had different rights they couldn't join the army or enter to free public places, so it wouldn't make a big difference if Missouri was a free state or a slave state. Missouri was admitted as a slave state in exchange of Maine being admitted as a free state.


You might be interested in
The Battle of Stalingrad eventually
trasher [3.6K]
B. Was won by the Soviet Union.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one reason the Americans won the Mexican- American War?
Thepotemich [5.8K]
B. They had better Military Leadership
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was nullification considered a states' rights issue?
Svetach [21]
To nullify is to discontinue or not allow a certain law to be in a certain state, meaning that the state has the right to choose if it would abide by that federal law or not.
It was a state's rights issue because states couldn't do their own thing, they all had the exact same laws.
6 0
3 years ago
What Is the relationship between the first three articles of confederation and the branches of government?
ohaa [14]

Answer:

The first three articles establish the three branches of government and their powers: Legislative (Congress), Executive (office of the President,) and Judicial (Federal court system). A system of checks and balances prevents any one of these separate powers from becoming dominant.

your welcome

6 0
3 years ago
Escribir un texto en el que se relacionen TODAS estas palabras: Ministros – administrar – intendente – presidente – gobernador –
nirvana33 [79]

Answer:

<em>Argentina es una república federal y presidencialista, dividida político-administrativamente en provincias y municipios. A nivel </em><u><em>nacional</em></u><em>, léase federal, el país es dirigido por el </em><u><em>presidente</em></u><em>, quien nombrar a sus </em><u><em>ministros</em></u><em> para </em><u><em>administrar </em></u><em>todos los distintos rubros de la política pública federal, a nivel </em><u><em>provincial</em></u><em>, por el </em><u><em>gobernador</em></u><em>, y a nivel </em><u><em>municipal</em></u><em>, por el </em><u><em>intendente</em></u><em>. </em>

Explanation:

A continuación, consignamos un ejemplo con la colección de palabras incluida en el enunciado:

<em>Argentina es una república federal y presidencialista, dividida político-administrativamente en provincias y municipios. A nivel </em><u><em>nacional</em></u><em>, léase federal, el país es dirigido por el </em><u><em>presidente</em></u><em>, quien nombrar a sus </em><u><em>ministros</em></u><em> para </em><u><em>administrar </em></u><em>todos los distintos rubros de la política pública federal, a nivel </em><u><em>provincial</em></u><em>, por el </em><u><em>gobernador</em></u><em>, y a nivel </em><u><em>municipal</em></u><em>, por el </em><u><em>intendente</em></u><em>. </em>

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A) Which statements describe characteristics of pure competition? Check all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • What did the United States hope to gain from the purchase of Alaska? (1 point)
    11·2 answers
  • What did interventionists believe the united states should do about the war?
    9·2 answers
  • How many ni8gers can you count?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the captain view the slaves aboard his ship?​
    12·1 answer
  • Why did many Americans push for reform in the workplace during the 1800s?
    5·1 answer
  • Extra points
    13·2 answers
  • Why was literature important in the 1920s
    9·1 answer
  • Features of bartering and monetary exchange in ancient China
    10·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between POWER and REVOLUTION
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!