Answer:
13. Charlie would be excluded for cause;
14. the plaintiff provides proof only up to the level of “clear and convincing,” Casey can still be acquitted.
Explanation:
Since it was realised that Charlie has a relationship with on of the parties summoned for a case, this will lead to Charlie been removed and excluded for cause. This is because it is believed that due to the fact that he has a relationship with the person, there may be bias which may lead to a false outcome regarding the case.
For the second question, Cash can be acquitted if there's proof which is provided by the plaintiff and the proof is clear enough and convincing.
Answer:
because as prices rise, the purchasing power of each dollar earned falls, and consumers are willing and able to buy less of a good
Explanation:
Answer:
trademark
Explanation:
The trademark refers to the logo design, name, word, symbol of the product that represents the company and used for the sale of the goods.
With the help of the trademark, the company could distinguish its products as compared with the competitors with the motive to gain a competitive advantage in the market place
Therefore this is a trademark
Answer:
The correct answer is (a)- Parallel teams.
Explanation:
The majority of the teams in which the manager or boss assigns and directs the work of the team, normally what we see is the so-called "parallel work" in which each team member develops only one functionality planned in the scope of the project . This type of organization gives the administrator the feeling that several of the functionalities are being developed at the same time, which should ensure that the project is not delayed. Well, if we analyze this with a little more care we will see that what happens is exactly the opposite.
It is false that the effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers.
<h3>What is Tax?</h3>
Tax refer compulsory levy or contribution place on individual, organization or state which is levied by government majorly on workers income or business profits of companies or can be added to cost of goods, services or even any transactions done.
Therefore, It is false that the effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers because the effect of tax on consumers or producers is normally determined by price elasticity.
Learn more about tax from the link below.
brainly.com/question/25783927
