4.when you divide the closing price by the dividend you get a number higher thsn 50
Answer with its Explanation:
The forces that had lessened the importance of the cost and management accounting systems in today's dynamic world are as under:
- The ancient bookkeeping and the costing techniques were very time consuming and the accounting systems were also not integrated with the financial accounting systems. Today we have very robust and integrated systems which helps the management of the business operations nation wide with greater security and better performance than the previous old versions.
- The complexity of the organization operations have resulted in origination of additional management accounting techniques that were adapted in the form of automated software, that are used to produce management reports on daily, weekly, monthly and yearly basis. The examples include the Throughput costing, Activity based costing, Bench-marking techniques, etc.
- The activities automation has led to attaining of maximum efficiency possible in some areas which wasn't possible in the past. The robots management systems, activity automation, etc has increased the fixed cost share in the total cost and the variable cost has become a very minute share of the total cost of the activity. This variable cost which is often referred to as controllable cost, is very less in percentage share of total cost today than 10 years back. In the future, we will see it as a very very very small share of total cost. This makes the today's management costing techniques obsolete and requires new solutions, new techniques, new softwares, etc. to manage the companies operations.
The AICPA is required to adopt ethics standards that are at least as restrictive as the IESBA rules , The Last Statement describes how the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' (IESBA) Code impacts the U.S. accounting profession
Explanation:
In February 2017, the AICPA Executive board on Professional Ethics decided to suggest changes to the system of professional conduct requiring certain measures when members are aware of non-compliance with legislation or regulations related to their involvement or employment.
IESBA also created a structure for accountants to follow the IESBA Professional Accountants ' Code of Ethics–in particular the problem of the tension between sharing non-compatibility with appropriate people and keeping client or contractor knowledge confidential— while hearing of unlawful acts under the new standard. The application of this code has been called NOCLAR. The recommendation from the AICPA is largely in line with the IESBA system, but significant differences do remain.
Answer:
During the first year, the marginal cost equals approximately the minimum EUAC cost. This is why the minimum cost of EUAC to maintain the defender throughout the year is $21,000. Since the minimum EUAC cost to maintain the defender the first year is less than the minimum EUAC cost to the challenger, the defender should not be substituted. This means, it is not economically feasible to make the replacement at this time.
Explanation:
According to the exercise, it is necessary to evaluate to know if it is economic to replace the defender by the challenger. For the calculation, the defender's information is: the defender's market value up to $3000. The expenses are $20000. The information regarding the challenger is: the installation cost $30000, the annual expenses $ 16000, the surrender value $ 2000, the economic life is 12 years, and the interest rate before taxes is 15%.
The minimum EUAC for the challenger is equal to:
The minimal cost is equal to:
