The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The Agile Manifesto principle that I am going to pick in the principle of "Embracing Change."
I think this is likely to have the biggest impact on the success or failure of a typical project in my organization because change is the constant in modern-day business. Probably, since the inception of the modern-day industry.
In order to be successful and maintain that success over the years -no matter the conditions- a company has to be ready not only to adapt to change but to change ahead of necessity. And this is one of the most difficult things to do in business because people love to be in a comfort zone for years. People in corporate America likes to know they are safe in their traditional places doing traditional things. For them, change is tough.
That is why I think "Embrace change" would be the principle that would help me the most.
Answer:
3rd stage or Norming stage of group development.
Explanation:
3rd stage or Norming stage of group development.
In this stage responsibilities among group member is divided on the basis of their skills. During this stage members start to cooperate with other co members. A bonding among the members is start to developed which result in understanding each other contribution and identity. The main advantage of this understanding is that conflicts and misunderstanding issues has been resolved at faster rate.
Answer:
a) difference.
Explanation:
As we know the budget represents the difference between the expected and the actual results
So as per the given situation, in the case when the amount of the expected and the actual results are not same or similar so it should be the budget difference
hence, the option a is correct
And, the rest of the options are incorrect
Answer: all money in circulation throughout the economy
Explanation: apex
Answer: 1. real GDP declined.
Explanation:
If labor productivity fell yet the workforce did not increase, that means that for Years 1 and 2, workers were producing less than they were producing before because the same number of people were producing.
This means that the amount of goods produced in the country would reduce and therefore GDP would reduce as well as GDP is the amount of goods and services produced in a country. If labor productivity had fallen yet the work-hours had increased, the increase in worker hours would have made up for the loss of labor productivity.
