Clyde and Sarah just watched their teammate fail at an important athletic competition. Clyde then succeeded at the competition,
and Sarah failed. Based on this scenario, which of the following is most likely to be accurate? a) Sarah had succeeded earlier in the same competition.
b) Clyde had succeeded earlier in the same competition.
B). Clyde had succeeded earlier in the same competition.
Explanation:
As per the question, option B i.e. 'Clyde had succeeded earlier in the same competition' seems to be the most accurate as it appropriately that Clyde must have had the earlier experience of succeeding in the same competition because after witnessing a failure an individual requires sufficient motivational strength to regain the vigor to perform with full strength and succeed. Thus, <u>Clyde must have gained this motivation and encouragement from her successful past experience to succeed in the competition which Sarah did not have and thus, she failed.</u> Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
The answer is Phil who makes his identification in less than
10 seconds. Through 4 researches, the authors revealed that a time border of approximately
10 to 12 s best distinguished accurate from inaccurate positive proof of
identity. Witnesses constructing their identification faster than 10 to 12 s
were closely 90% precise; those taking lengthier were approximately 50%
accurate.
The answer to this question is <span>hypothetical example </span><span>hypothetical example is a type of example that derived from fiction (never actually happen in real life) In public speaking, hypothetical examples usually used to make the content much more entertaining for the audiences.</span>
It became clear that both cathy and simon felt they should lead the group. other group members began aligning themselves with one or the other. this group is in the storming stage.
Perhaps the most significant development of mathematics during the Renaissance was the invention of infinitesimal calculus by Newton and Leibniz, at the end of the 17th century. This refers to the study of change based around limits, differentials and integration.
