The correct answer is B. Occurred in Philadelphia in 1787
Explanation:
In grammar, a fragment refers to a set of words that go together but are not sentences because they do not have a complete meaning, a subject (the entity that carries out the action) or a verb (action of the sentence). Because of this, fragments can usually be corrected or made into sentences by adding a subject, a verb or other type of words to make it complete. Also, the type of information that needs to be added depends on the information that is already included in the fragment. This means a fragment that could be corrected by only adding a subject is a fragment that contains a verb and some information about it that works as a complement but lacks a subject. Considering this, the fragment that you could correct by adding only a subject is "occurred in Philadelphia in 1787" because this fragment contains a verb "occurred" and a complement "in Philadelphia in 1787", which means by adding only a subject such as "the convention" or "the accident" the fragment would be corrected into a complete sentence.
The question above wants to analyze your reading and writing skills. For that reason, I can't write an answer for you, but I'll show you how to write it.
First, you should read the "Everyman" text and understand the character, the themes, the concepts, and how it relates to your life and your experiences.
This reading and comprehension of the text can be facilitated by articles that analyze the text and explain these elements in a more profound and professional way. You can find these articles on some research sites.
<h3>Response structure</h3>
- Describe who Everyman is.
- Describe how inspiring his journey can be.
- Show the themes and lessons it presents.
- Show how you or someone else can relate to Everyman's life.
More information about "Everyman" at the link:
brainly.com/question/618033
B. caesura ..............
Answer:
A. Emerson repeats the word consistency to emphasize his disapproval of compliant thinking.
Explanation:
In the book, 'Self Reliance', by Ralph Waldo Emerson, the author talked about people who wanted to be consistent in their actions. This consistency stems from the fact that they wanted to always please people who know them by certain actions or ways of life in the past. Since they do not want to be seen in a different light, they fall back to a consistent lifestyle in order to be consistent from others perspective.
Emerson condemned such compliant thinking because he was an advocate of people not being limited in their thinking. People, he believed should be able to explore and reason extensively. They should also learn from their mistakes at their own pace, not conforming to the ideas or dictates of others.
