For the answer to the question above, the commercial team was divided into two departments which are purchasing and sales.
This traditional back office and front office split are common among traditional companies. He referred to it as the left hand who was selling the fish didn't know what the right hand was catching and it results in operational suffering. The sales department would sell fish that Caladero didn't catch or would fail to sell the catch. The result was disappointed customers, unsold fish, and error in orders.
Answer:
No; Warren weakens her point by claiming that the Paycheck Fairness Act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." No; Warren weakens her point by noting, "Today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes." Yes; Warren supports her point by noting, "Pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women."
Explanation:
In addition to the aforementioned answer, the rhetoric that women make less simply because of discrimination, is factually inaccurate and is not supported by any data. In fact the difference in income is always drawn back to the job choices that women choose. Women are more art/literature bound for jobs whereas men choose higher paying jobs such as STEM, engineering, etc...
Hillary Clinton is the term to describe depriving a person of rights and protection.
The best answer — and correct answer — is: [C]: "objective" .
_____________________________________________________
Your question is incomplete, so I would have to give you a general overview to enable you get to the right answer.
The writer should logically integrate his research <u>after making a claim</u>
When a writer is trying to include a research into his essay, this is a supporting evidence that is used to <u>validate a claim.</u>
<u />
With this in mind, we should know that the author is trying to <u>back up a claim</u> he has already previously made.
For example, if an author is trying to make a point about dangers of bush burning, after he had made a claim that bush burning can worsen the ozone layer (for example), then he would bring evidence which shows how much the ozone layer has deteriorated after series of bush burning over the years
With this in mind, a writer would logically integrate his research <u>after making a claim</u>
Read more here
brainly.com/question/21608125
