Answer:
There is no answer, because I can not see the passage you are talking about. Sorry
Explanation:
A political and constitutional issue that Americans have different beliefs and opinions on is the issue of Gun control.
Those who support gun control believe that it would help reduce the high rate of gun violence that is witnessed in the United States every year from mass shootings to robberies and murders.
Those who are against gun control believe that Americans should have the right to bear arms to be able to defend themselves from aggression. They believe that the more people with guns, the less likely others are able to engage in mass shootings as they would be shot.
<h3 /><h3>What does t
he Constitution say on gun rights?</h3>
The United States Constitution in the Second Amendment allows Americans to be able to bear arms and this has created a debate between those who support gun control and those who don't.
The supporters of gun control believe that it would help reduce the high rate of gun violence that is witnessed in the United States every year from mass shootings to robberies and murders.
The dissenters and those who argue against gun control believe that Americans should have the right to bear arms to be able to defend themselves from aggression. They believe that the more people with guns, the less likely others are able to engage in mass shootings as they would be shot.
Find out more on gun control in the United States at brainly.com/question/4379013
#SPJ1
He refers to his subordinate statement, he did not take the decisions, he only obeyed them. The moral implications of the policies of President Van Buren (and his predecessor Andrew Jackson) did not make those orders easy. But as a subordinate and not popularly elected, I had to obey them. Finding the best conditions for the Cherokee people was all he could do. In his instructions to the militia, he reminded them that any act of cruelty would become "an aberration to the generous sympathies of the American people" (many of whom, like John Quincy Adams, were against the transfer, blaming Southern politicians and the land usurpers ").
The government was divided into three branches, judicial, legislative, and executive. The federalist believed that the national government should take care of everything and have the ultimate authority, but the constitution limited what the branches could do, therefore, the federalist believed that the constitution gave the national government too much power. The Anti-Federalist argued that the constitution gave too much power to the federal government. The Federalist believed that the nation might not survive without the passing of the constitution, and that a stronger national government was necessary after the Articles of Confederation failed.
Answer:
yo can you come answer my questions pls
Explanation:
